Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | robot9000's commentslogin

This so-called lightweight syntax gives me anxiety just scrolling through these examples.


How do I copy files from my iPhone's download folder to my Mac again? My memory is rather fuzzy.


The theorem would be using iCloud to sync them. If that’s not an option I believe you should be able access the downloads folder when you connect your iPhone to the Mac via Finder. The third option being airdropping the files themselves.


Lol wtf work flow is that?

Man Mac iOS and osx are cooked af in workflows. Had a client recently run out of space on phone due to photos. Lol turns out apples sync is all or nothing. She couldn't free up space by telling iPhoto to not sync ancient ass shit, also extra iCloud storage. Can't use it while syncs on as your old phone only has 10gigs of space. Lol complete joke, told her to go rant at the local apple shop about it.

Predatory af and shite from apple. She can't even just plug phone in and strip the photos to a usb or external cus lol iPhoto/iTunes/apparently you should only do stuff how apple wants you to do stuff. Apple products are cooked af.

On and trying to find or free up space on the phone? Ahahhaha good luck, apple happily grouped 30% of the devices storage to "other apple apps" to with zero descriptors or indicators to what they were or how to delete them. Products a joke.


Airdrop. I find it's pretty reliable these days, though sometimes I have to toggle Bluetooth off and then on again on my Mac for it to work.


iCloud. Or Google Drive. Or OneDrive.


These are all such terrible answers to that question they serve as supporting the comment's implicated critique. I don't mean that your answer is incorrect. You are correct that these are the simplest means provided to accomplish that task.

But the provided means are gross.

You shouldn't need to go out to the internet, consume a cloud service, and come back, just to go from your phone to your laptop, and all of these big service providers shouldn't be making it so that that is the path of least resistance, or even damned near the only possible path.

It's a great example of how the incentives of the companies are opposite to those of the users.


If someone prefers another workflow, there’s always Android/Windows/Linux…


Saying 'workflow' misses the point and seems to almost intentionally miss the point by turning the criticism into a criticismmof something trivial or a mere preference instead of the fundamental wrong that it is.

The internet and the cloud are great and super convenient. But that is a seperate issue from companies steering everyone into actually requiring good internet speed and lots of bandwidth cap, and the consumption of subscription storage space, or worse free storage space where ypu are the product, not because ypu choose to but because no other option is even presented.

The critique was not about some preferred sequence of buttons to click no different from any other sequence. I decline to believe you didn't understand that when you said "workflow".


You don't, that would be using it wrong, like holding a phone touching it's sides /s


I don't get what you're trying to say.


Remove the "as a kid" part and you're now a conspiracy theorist, or one of those people.


First game I thought of. Baba is hardcore.


Huge!

But the bigger surprise is that there's literally nothing in it that I care about despite being an iOS user.

Also, multiple stops on Maps? That's Google maps 15 years ago.


Doesn't really matter if Google Maps had it first, I like Apple Maps more and I'm excited for the feature.

Google Maps UI is a mess - only real advantage is (usually) better POI data. Routing quality is the same in my experience.


I finally swapped to Apple maps permanently. Was ~okay with giving Google my data because it's routing was better, but now Apple is on par, there is no reason to continue to use Google maps.


As someone who tries to avoid Google products more and more, I'm glad they improve Apple Maps. I have zero Google app installed on my iPhone today, but Google Maps is the one I'm the most tempted to use occasionally. I use it in the browser instead but the experience sucks.

On my side I'm kinda excited about live notifications, it looks cool for food deliveries.


15 years ago? Wow! Seeing Google Maps came out 17 years ago, that’s really early in their lifetime!


Apple collects your browsing history, something which I have yet to find a good explanation for. https://apps.apple.com/zm/app/safari/id1146562112


Safari history and tabs are end-to-end encrypted: https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT202303

And Apple provides iCloud+ members with a VPN which does not tie browsing history to users by separating ingress and egress traffic and using encrypted forwarding (similar to onion routing): https://www.apple.com/privacy/docs/iCloud_Private_Relay_Over...


>Safari history and tabs are end-to-end encrypted: https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT202303

They are for iCloud backup, which is not the same as the data collected by the App AFAIK.


iCloud backup is not end to end encrypted. iCloud sync of Safari History, Tab Groups, and iCloud Tabs is. The data collection the app page mentioned sounds like a 3rd thing. Or even E2EE is considered data collection for App Store purposes.


That link is to Safari on iOS and it says that your browsing history may be collected but it’s not linked to your identity.

Is it a privacy problem if Apple collects aggregate browsing history from iOS users?

And is this relevant to a thread about desktop browsers?


I visit my HN comments page almost daily. There’s no way this can be anonymized away from me as the url contains my userid and can be linked back to me.

Even anonymized, data can be used in negative ways against me (eg, trying to alter my purchase behavior through ads).


Unless sufficiently anonymized - and I don't know how much is actually sufficient - your browsing history can be used to identify you.


Your statement seems to leave away some important "details", so here is the full text from your link:

The following data may be collected but it is not linked to your identity: Location Browsing History Usage Data Diagnostics


Wouldn’t most peoples browsing history plus location pretty much narrow them down to one person?


It says the collected browsing data is not linked to the user's identity. Still a bad move by Apple.


NATO Troll. Ignore.


NATO troll is a really funny idea, I'll give you that.


Maybe in California, but it's a lot less likely in the civilized world.


It's not the civilized world, but here in the south you'll wake up with a racoon in your pocket making off with your Dentyne Ice and a flock of mosquitos airlifting a liter of O-positive.


That's doesn't sound like a big deal. I don't really care for that type of gum and that isn't even close to my blood type.


I don't get it.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: