I can’t obviously. But if they don’t have enough, despite massive overdosing for years, that would be very surprising. (The test only shows one of three possible outcomes. It is not a quantitative procedure.)
Concur: that would be surprising. I was more focused on the possibility of having a dangerously high blood level which is fraught with negative sequelae.
This test — among many others — offer quantitative results at home:
Cool... I guess it depends which model you are using for these tasks. Are there certain models that perform better for a certain task, or maybe could be recommended based on quality/cost?
reply