Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | pwnfunction's commentslogin

next is to build a disassembled inside a pdf

Alchemist Owl got there already:

https://www.alchemistowl.org/pocorgtfo/

POC||GTFO is one of those things that, once you dive in, you will never regret taking the effort to fully grok.

...

AI-Generated summary of issues relating to disassembly:

PoC||GTFO 0x10 (pocorgtfo10.pdf, January 2016): Titled around "IN THE THEATER OF LITERATE DISASSEMBLY," this entire issue focuses on reverse engineering and disassembly. It includes articles and examples involving disassembly of various systems (e.g., mentions of built-in monitors and naive disassemblers like in Apple ][ contexts, along with reverse engineering hood-lifting). It heavily features disassembly as a theme, with likely code listings and explanations that effectively serve as or demonstrate disassembler usage/output.

PoC||GTFO 0x21 (pocorgtfo21.pdf, February 2022): This issue explicitly mentions a "Notebook of Altera NIOS Disassembly" in its content/description. Articles cover disassembly (e.g., of Altera NIOS soft-core processor code), and one notes that while focused on disassembly, full target plugins would include an assembler, disassembler, code analysis, etc. This strongly indicates the PDF contains disassembly examples, outputs, or even PoC implementations/discussions of disassembler functionality for that architecture.

Other issues occasionally include disassembly snippets or references (e.g., 0x11, 0x13, 0x15 show snippets like disassembled code blocks for specific exploits or systems), but they are more incidental rather than centered on a disassembler tool or example.



hello everyone, author here.

although this is self-hostable on gcp, they can get quite expensive due to the machines used. cheapest vm with nested virtualisation on gcp costs about $60/mo. on aws, you'd have to go with bare metal, which can cost you a lot more.

i think the next best thing for sandboxes is, "vm as a library", atleast for personal/small scale workloads.


do you think the "bug" exist in the latent space? i don't think all bugs does.. the bugs exist as long as variant exist in the trained weights. until we have some kinda rl env for verifying bugs.. its never gonna work "well".


is this opensource? adding a cool fluid simulation to whatever you draw would be really fun. its like one of those ioccc vids - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QMYfkOtYYlg


Very interesting one! So many cool things have been made in this field! However I think it's not relevant for the board. It's not open-sourced (at least yet).

Anyway thank you for checking it out and suggestion!


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: