I thought it was just me with this opinion. I have always thought his style reminds me of a high school kid learning how to interview, just very amateurish. Not sure how he really ever got so popular..
Personally I like him because he is amateurish. I think you'll find that people can relate to amateur level discussions because most people are amateurs.
This!
A pet-peeve of mine is when a vendor refers to someone as a "Resource". "One of our team members can help you with X" at least refers to a person than a person as an object or a thing...
Employers must forget the 40 hour week as a measure of someone's productivity and instead set goals to be achieved.
Manage/Treat people like people,be kind, but firm, if you can't trust someone in your team, you hired wrong or you have trust issues yourself. Its not rocket science, no matter how much BS the Simon Sinek`s of the world spout out.
I was SA'd by the VP of HR at a previous company. I asked around, and apparently there is no one that can report that to except for HR, so in several companies HR can do anything they want.
I don’t have a set of clear goals and objectives. I have a very broad problem area and my job is “make this better.” And I’m salaried so I spend about 40-60 hours per week in this area. I think my employer trusts me quite a bit.
For task based jobs by all means figure out a cost and bill by the item. Some professionals do this. I paid my accountant $600 and didn’t care how long it took her.
Software houses need to bill client for something and usually that is just number_of_hours * rate, where is the push for "accurate" reporting comes from.
reply