Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | professor_x's comments login

Im just someone interested in geospatial. Im a regular SWE. Seems like <1% of SWE jobs have even a nominal geospatial element like putting pins on a map.

Any tips in general? Not just for breaking in but what you wish you knew


That's an extremely general question. But mostly my take is: geospatial is not that hard. There are a lot of dinosaurs out there and legacy GIS companies who want you to believe that GIS is special and requires all kinds of specialist knowledge. But for most applications, you can just treat it as, data that happens to also have latitudes and longitudes. And then, it really is just points, lines and polygons the vast majority of the time.

Once you have specific goals about what you're trying to do with data, and how to visualise it etc, then there are usually straightforward solutions to achieving them. The difficulty can sometimes be describing them, or forming the right conceptual model.

It's worth getting really familiar with the GeoJSON spec, and using that as your data structure wherever possible.


Safe relative to what?

Being a Venetian banker or Chinese tea exporter wasnt that safe. What about prospecting for gold in Colorado river valleys where bears hang out? Moving trains of camels thru the Sahara? Chasing whales around for years at a time without going home.

Today is way better.


I don't think OP is arguing in bad faith.The fact is it's unclear what laws this legal argument is supported by.


Agreed, it is unclear. It's also a very commonly discussed issue with generative AI and there's been a significant amount of buzz around this. Is the NYT testing the legal waters? Maybe. Will this case set precedent? Yes. Is this a silly, random, completely unhinged case to bring?

No.


Yes this sounds like the best of both worlds tbh. Id like to find a list of companies which have this.


Mostly fully remote companies will have something where everyone gets together at least once a year.


Interesting that galaxies can collide without a star hitting another star.. but would it also be that the distances are so vast that the stars dont even (or mostly dont even) affect each other?


I don't know about the percentage of affected stars in a typical galaxy collision but note that you don't need a collision for two stars to affect each other. We're not speaking of interaction like on a pool table. The gravity will significantly affect star systems that pass significantly close from each other.


> I don't know about the percentage of affected stars in a typical galaxy collision but note that you don't need a collision for two stars to affect each other.

True, but the way in which they affect each other is that they try their best to collide.

From that perspective, it's kind of weird if collisions don't happen.


Is it? Think of a single star during a galactic collision. It wants to collide with every star in the other galaxy. It gets pulled this way and that, so, in sum, it decides to collide with the oncoming galaxy as a whole. Unfortunately, despite having billions or trillions of stars, that other galaxy is mostly empty space. The poor original star that we were tracking was unable to collide with any star at all.


Well, why do we keep attempting to collide with the Sun instead of striking out for the center of the Milky Way? Everything you just wrote applies just as much to the Earth as it does to a star heading through a foreign galaxy.


Why would stars hit each other during galactic collisions when stars inside of a single galaxy already almost never hit each other? Apparently reading it here of all the stars in the galaxy, a stellar collision only happens once every 10 000 years.

Interestingly enough, when galaxies collide, the supermassive black holes at their centres do typically merge as their gravity is strong enough to attract each other.

It's by the way not particularly unlikely for stars to pass through other solar systems. Apparently about 70 000 years ago a binary star system flew through the Oort Cloud.


Thinking of the scales involved, even at the speed of light probably two masses couldn’t pull each other fast enough to collide (if you are colliding the two galaxies at the fastest manifestible speed which is the speed of the light).

That’s hand wavy because if you’re imagining like grabbing the two galaxies and smashing them together… that’s like giga levels of magnitude faster dynamics than the speed of light, ha!

You’d have to like put the galaxies on top of each other and leave them there, probably for years, for gravity to get everything moving quickly enough (and then for the speed of light to even bridge the distance!) before really anything would happen. I think.

Engineer but not a physicist.


An other aspect is that orbital mechanics are weird/chaotic. Specially when you get masses that are similar scale. Like why hasn't moon hit earth yet?

So with two galaxies colliding I would not expect the stars to hit each other as result of collision. But as result of interactions when speeds increase.


And yet the galaxies usually get ripped apart.


how does this happen in practice? This must all be computerized now, you’re either in the system or not. Why does the officers beliefs factor into whether or not you have a warrant


Irish people are just insanely delightful


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: