Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | profdevloper's commentslogin

Who's 'we' in this context? USA? China? Developing nations?

Global economy. You cannot shift the consumption blame onto the country producing the good for another. The pollution in China created to make phones for Americans is part of the same transaction.

It's like when the US used to ship our plastic waste to China, and China stopped accepting it. China only had a plastics pollution problem because it was a cheap buck to sweep an American problem under a Chinese rug.


That's technically still true according to the tax laws here, but Trump raised the standard deduction during his first term in office so where I previously took an itemized deduction and claimed my mortgage interest from my taxable income, it's now more beneficial for my (basic) tax situation to claim the standard deduction. I appreciate the simplicity, but I'm no longer getting a tax benefit for home ownership.

I own a modest house that I bought close to 20 years ago before the standard deduction changes. The first year the calculated tax savings from itemizing was a whopping $800. This went down every year and at year 7-8 it no longer made sense to itemize. Interest rates are higher now but the standard deduction is way higher now as well. This strikes me as something that was a big deal in the very high interest rate 80s and has then been parroted as a huge benefit for decades after is largely ceased being true.

I pay less under "orange man bad" than I did under "Prof Autopen the funder of perpetual war."

Sure it may be the engineers implementing product tours, but I don't think they're the ones pushing for them.


Sounds like he needs to be out of business


Never enough


Depends on the neighborhood


Using MakeMKV to digitize these skips these intro screens by default (< 120 seconds), so I don't see them.


If this is noteworthy, the burden of proof should be on the poster, not the reader to substantiate these claims.


I don't really like this take, as it tries to make being informed somehow not the readers responsibility.


Sorry, not going to open a cold case file for every HN claim. Citations would be good. I'd read them.


Maybe just Occam's Razor -- any time I've seen Sam talk in public he just seems to be a neurotic, anxious individual that would have a hard time interacting with people in any normal context. In a world of infinite variables it's hard to say that his aversion was due to your race -- there's really not much to go on here.


Why would you think Occam's Razor would not determine that racism is the reason? It's just as simple of an explanation as anxiety.

I'm not sure some people understand how "normal" racism is.


Racism is a social bias that isn't "hardwired". It does not trigger the "fight or flight" response like was described in the earlier tale. Anxiety, of course, describes a "fight or flight" system that is malfunctioning. It is the most likely explanation because that is what was originally described. Mind you, the story could have been misrepresented. We do have to put our faith into what was written.

Another comment suggested that Altman was once beat up by a black man. If true, it is possible Sam has developed a conditioned response that associates black men with danger and his reaction stemmed from that. However, that isn't the same thing as racism and to try and categorize it as such would be quite disingenuous.


It's 2026, the "fuck" modifier for post titles by "thought leaders" has been done already ad nauseam. Time to retire it and give us all a break.



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: