There is also a deeply worrying trend to "milk" creators, in "controversial" topics, by banning them and taking the income for the company.
It allows for unholy alliances of company revenue, controversial topics, and state driven brigading.
What keeps my hope for democracies in the world is an observation I made after reading The Year 2000 by Joseph Goebbels written on 25 February 1945. He more or less said that Stalin wasn't bound by the rules of democracies then he would succeed after all. I like to analyze such predictions because you know the outcome and you can guess what was wrong when someone wrote this. My version is that democracies have values kept while transitioning from a state to a state (after elections) while dictatorships change in many respects. It was visible in the Soviet Union, every new ruler brought a new system despite the fact that they all claimed to fight for the same goals.
There were also significantly counter-culture movements against anti-imperialism similar to the russian anti-woke-culture war (after all it discredits imperialism) and thus dissolves the russian empire if looked at through this lense. They were just discredited after hitler dialed imperialism up to eleven.
I think it is too small to form a ring. At <1km, it may require an orbit so low that atmospheric drag would take over before tidal forces could pull it into a ring.
All things have to be atomic, individual, always. There is no society and no society level discourse allowed, using individuals as samples. Any discussion of societal level problems and solutions is heavily discouraged, by those running societies. You must focus more on the self, the small unit. Always.
Change is forbidden, and subverted through the discussion culture that reflects on it.