Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | phsau's commentslogin

Could you provide an article that explores this difference? I'd like to understand the mechanics of this and see how this conclusion is reached.

Port 25 is only uncommon for client submission, but prevalent for MTA>MTA traffic.


>Almost every single objection to data centers in space has already been overcome at a smaller scale with Starlink

Did you not read the article? It had many objections that make it clear datacenters in space are unworkable...


Starlink is already a small data center! It has power, radiators, and compute!

It needs to be scaled up, but there is no obstacle to that (at least none that the article mentions).

The only valid objection is cost, but space prices keep dropping and earth prices keep rising.


> Starlink is already a small data center! It has power, radiators, and compute!

It is not. This is like saying your phone is already a small data centre. While technically true, we're not talking about the same scale here. StarLink's compute power is a tiny fraction of a modern data centre GPU/TPU. Most of the power budget goes into communication (i.e. its purpose!).


And if you read the story, it's because he ignored the fact that the password manager didn't prompt auto-fill.

"I went to the link which is on mailchimp-sso.com and entered my credentials which - crucially - did not auto-complete from 1Password. I then entered the OTP and the page hung. Moments later, the penny dropped, and I logged onto the official website, which Mailchimp confirmed via a notification email which showed my London IP address:"


It's cheaper and more accessible than ever to use DMA/hardware cheats from cheat vendors.


DMA cheats are only usable as many games aren't willing to pull-up their minimum requirements to play. IOMMU defeats DMA attacks. Secureboot (largely) solves pre-boot EFI related concerns.


https://www.defense.gov/News/News-Stories/Article/Article/39...

The DoD says North Korean soldiers are already in Kursk and preparing? News of NK armament deliveries and use is old at this point and not debatable.

Is the DoD spreading fake news? Just because they haven't seen front-line combat _in Ukraine_ doesn't mean Russia isn't using NK assets.


I believe NK soldiers are there, by I'd trust even Putin more than US sources. After all, they only state what is in their interest. Exactly like Putin.

Maybe NK will use Saddam's nukes against Ukraine...


Yes? Hasn't the DoD also maintained the line that there are no US forces in Syria for years too? It's really not so surprising that they'd lie.


> Hasn't the DoD also maintained the line that there are no US forces in Syria for years too?

If that’s true, they might want to stop publishing press releases about their actions in Syria.

“CENCOM Destroys Threatening Weapons Systems in Syria” https://www.defense.gov/News/News-Stories/Article/Article/39...

“US will remain in eastern Syria and seek to prevent IS resurgence, Pentagon says” https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/us-will-remain-eas...


No, they haven't.


Wouldn't it be better to keep the tree and its roots away from the drain? That growth might come at significant cost!


Malicious traffic is not limited to ssh and comes from the same usual suspects. Automated attacks against web applications is constant. I wouldn't say it's indiscriminate, it's practical.


There are bad people on both side of the border - don't be fooled that they are more on the "other" side of the border because there might be ones that you are not seeing (yet). Blocking the whole "other side" is simply the "path of least resistance" or the "low hanging fruit". Creation and all other good things ALWAYS require more energy than destruction and other bad things. But creation/invention is the only activity that leads to progress and evolution - everything else is stalling, regression, devolution ... Internet was created BY military FOR military - but it evolved into THE only thing in the world that connects people. ALL people. References at the bottom.

The most general problem in Internet are not the malicious people - botnets can infect insecure devices ANYWHERE in the world. The main problem is that some (many) of the ISPs at the last mile allow outgoing IP packets with source IP address which is outside of the IP range(s) these ISPs operate/own. Larger ISPs on the upper layer can not prevent this because otherwise IP routing will break. So it all depends on the "last mile" ISPs. And it is quite possible for the "status quo" to live for many years ....

https://www.internetsociety.org/resources/2022/impact-of-ukr... https://labs.ripe.net/author/athina/how-sanctions-affect-the... https://labs.ripe.net/author/farzaneh-badiei/sanctions-and-t... https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030859612... https://labs.ripe.net/author/moritz_muller/internet-sanction...


It's workload dependent; XFS performs better for our database needs.


Compared to Ext4 or ZFS?


i'd rekon cow fs performs somewhat poorly with db workload, so, both


The source for this article is SensorTower Store Intelligence, which claims to have "download and revenue data for nearly all mobile apps available in the App Store and GooglePlay". How are they getting revenue data when it's not publicly available (to my knowledge)?


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: