I mean they make a bold statement up top just to paddle back a little bit further down with: "[…] In terms of Chinese and Cantonese recognition, the SenseVoice-Small model has advantages."
The Guardian, especially for their podcasts, is the only news website I am paying and have ever payed for. And I pay more willingly than any other newspaper would get from me for their paywall stuff. It‘s that valuable for me to support this approach.
Language learning via hearing comprehension of content not produced in the target language is almost impossible, because the subtitles never match.
However there‘s s difference between CC (close captions) and subtitles, with the former being the verbatim representation (including sfx, music etc.) in my experience.
Correct, and you can find CCs more likely on movies and shows that were shot in the respective language itself. For example, the stuff from https://www.netflix.com/browse/genre/100396 is much more likely to have 100% accurate captions if your goal is to learn Spanish
I found dubbed shows significantly easier to listen then native shows. It is actually easier to learn from those then from native shows. Dubbing is almost always better pronounced and less mixed with background sounds.
Also, the claim that it is impossible to learn if you don't have perfect cc subtitle in target language is absurd. You can use subtitles in own language to get the meaning.
Keto is a very special case where the body depletes its glucose storages so it switches to fat by force. It does work, but you have to stay out of any kind of carbohydrate for the rest of your life (or for whatever amount do you plan to stay in that state).
In non ketogenic states, input does somewhat equals output.
Nutrition experts still try to create a caloric deficit when they create nutrition plans.
If there was some sort of magic nutrient that made you lose weight by eating mostly the same food, I'm sure most nutrition experts would have known already.
I mean good for them for improving their user‘s experience. I am just surprised that maintaining your own webpack config seems like such challenge. Enabling chunks to split code to improve loading times or dynamic imports, it‘s not exactly rocket science. Yes DX and all improved as well, but CRA is such a bad choice for production code. It gets you going fast(er), but as soon as you have to tweak it, it seems like devs jump to the "next" framework that already has those tweaks builtin…until they hit the next roadblock. Thus you never learn what actually makes it all work.
Imo it's a question of prioritization - time spent fiddling with a Webpack config is time that could have been spent on something that will more immediately benefit a user. That's the big advantage we saw for switching to Next.js, which handles this and many other details for us, without the confusing & brittle hacks that had accumulated in our CRA setup.
> Thus you never learn what actually makes it all work.
I agree this is unsatisfying - however it's a problem no matter what! We have to live at some level of abstraction in order to make any forward progress. There can still be lots of learning along the way!
I couldn’t hide my dislike for it and commented. Maybe it was unnecessary to draw comparisons to reddit and it’d be better to just state HN rules. I will try to consider this next time. Thank you.
This is such as self-centered view. In reality, nobody really cares what is of value to you on HN, and your values are certainly not indicative of every other person on this site, either.
Speaking of HN rules, though, you may want to read up on them in the future:
> Please don't post comments saying that HN is turning into Reddit. It's a semi-noob illusion, as old as the hills.
It feels dishonest to me.
[0] https://github.com/FunAudioLLM/SenseVoice?tab=readme-ov-file...
reply