> Arch does this, Gentoo does this, NixOS does this, why does Debian has to be different?
I say this as someone who ran Gentoo for years and daily drives Arch today.
Because sometimes you don't want entire swaths of your server being rebuilt/tinkered with on a regular basis under the hood. "Move fast, break everything" is great in dev/test land, or a prod environment where the entire fleet is just containers treated like cattle, but contrary to what the SREs of the valley would believe, there's a whole ecosystem of 'stuff' out there that will never be containerized, where servers are still treated like pets, or rather, at least "cherished mules", that just do their job 24/7 and get the occasional required security updates/patches and then go right back to operating the same way they did last year.
I could be mistaken on this, as I don't live in an area where such things are common, but my understanding is the issue is that if your house is destroyed by say, a hurricane, no insurance provider (or fema) gives you a bag of cash and says "move", reimbursement is predicated on rebuilding the structure where it stood.
Insurance makes you whole, not the property. You are perfectly welcome to pocket the cash. Although if you have a mortgage, you do have an additional obligation to maintain the value of their collateral or pay off the loan.
If you have replacement cost coverage (as opposed to actual cash value (=depreciated value) you typically have to use it to reconstruct the home if you want the full amount. This is typical.
"We will pay no more than the actual cash value of the damage until actual repair or replacement is complete." [0]
So.. we should break a fundamental aspect of an 'open and free' internet by introducing a link tax, just because the horse and buggy people haven't taken the last 25 years to figure out how to sell automobiles by now?
Depends on the park. Some are known for it. Parents know to keep their kids away from those parks. For that reason, it’s better to have one really cruisy park that everyone knows about and can easily avoid but which also acts to contain the pervs. Maybe Omegle closing will just make the predators harder to spot and keep away from?
You've got an axe to grind don't you? Does it really not seem obvious to you that the damage of a single sexual harassment in a park outweighs any number of online interactions?
Except part of their 'value prop' is "We have this giant trove of human created content, and AI companies need to start paying us to utilize it when training their models".
GDPR has exceptions, this would be such an exception that doesn't allow you to simply invoke GDPR and get everything deleted. They just have to anonymize the poster by deleting their signature, avatar, profile,... while the posts can stay intact (unless they contain personal info).
Do you think they are going to go through each of your comments individually to determine if it contains personal info or not? That requires actual time and effort, and as an individual user you or your comments are nowhere even remotely in the vicinity of important enough for that.
It’s far easier for them to take the loss and delete wholesale.
Do they do this? I don’t know, I haven’t done it. But it certainly could be argued that by them not doing this, they are not fully complying with the requirements of a GDPR deletion request.
That would destroy their whole value proposition, your user generated content is their goldmine. Of course they don't have to sift through your thousands of posts to find the one that has GDPR info, you'll have to show them the post.
You cannot impose requirements like that as part of the deletion process.
It is 100% not the user’s responsibility to keep track of this information. That is explicitly a requirement of the provider and it is fully on them to ensure that a deletion request deletes all the personal data. If they didn’t tag it properly and can’t ensure that, then that is their problem to solve not yours.
Their value proposition is also not a single user’s data. It’s the entirety of the data set. One user’s data is nearly worthless, certainly not worth enough to have a human review it. Which was my point.
Just because a bunch of forums do it that way doesn't mean it's correct. When I was at Twitter the Compliance team determined that all user-generated content was Personal Data under the scope of GDPR. Those forums may be getting away with it right now, but they're playing with fire. If someone wanted to raise a stink with regulators they could be in trouble. I guarantee you if Reddit or a site of similar scope tried something like that someone would.
I know of two forums in two different EU countries that have also consulted with lawyers and determined that it was sufficient. I am inclined to give higher weight to your opinion simply because Twitter Compliance will have access to a larger team of lawyers, do you know if they were American lawyers or EU lawyers?
That does assume that reddit actually updates the comment entry in their backend instead of keeping histories of the edits which I'm not sure we've had any insight into.
That’s my assumption too, keeping a history for every user increases complexity tenfold, while flagging deleted comments seems to be a common practice even in smaller companies because it’s so simple.
Another user said they tried the data dump GDPR request and the comments included deleted comments but only the edited version, so I guess this can be verified at least.
There are public data dumps of Reddit comments available all the way up to December 2022. And they're only roughly ~2TB all together.
There's nothing stopping AI companies from just using those instead of paying Reddit $50 million to scrape all of them using the API. It would also be 10x-100x quicker to do that rather than hammer their API for the comments (the API sucks for mass data retrieval)
Sure, but companies doing that also wouldn’t be paying Reddit for that data.
The point of shredding comments isn’t to hurt the companies scraping the data (although that might be a nice side effect). Ultimately it’s to hurt Reddit.
Ah, good point. If this is the case, yeah, shred away. Still it's too bad that this greed will make it harder for humans to see useful old discussions.
Maybe we wouldn't have had Reddit, but I was perfectly content going to multiple phpBB boards when I was younger to discuss my hobbies.
Reddit always felt like a place to take from since it got lots of people by being centralized, but not really a place to contribute to unless you were contributing to the group think aspect of the community.
Communities specifically set up for answering questions or R&D were in my opinion the only valuable communities. Figuring out things or learning from the huge number of users was helpful, but it was never a fun place to just talk about any of my interests.
I'm really not a fan of comments like these. There is nothing inherently wrong with capitalism, and 'problems' like this could be solved vid regulation.
So no, the problem really is greed, and the extreme resistance to regulation in the US.
Well, capitalism is about choices. There are a multiple choices reddit could make, and there are multiple choices reddit users can make.
This is a fairly classic case of "you aren't the customer, you're the product", but that isn't the only way capitalism works.
This is capitalism and greed and disdain for the user.
I don't know if that will kill or materially damage reddit, but that combo kills plenty of regular businesses. (Salient difference is probably that user != customer, as with many internet businesses.)
Do you think that reddit actually deletes comments when the user presses delete? My assumption would be that it just sticks up a "do not display" flag in the database. I'm sure that there's some influence that GDPR has though.
The plug in I use (I think nuke Reddit) overwrites comments with random blarg that’s realistic sounding text, then deletes them.
I’m sure Reddit keeps all versions as well. But I think it would be impractical to restore to the correct version at scale unless they want to manually review to find the “right” version to restore.
I think if they got a specific subpoena for me, they could find my comments with a manual investigation, but I expect that will never happen as there’s no reason for anyone to do that.
I just want to remove my content from Reddit.com and make it harder if they decide to undelete or otherwise not respect my decision.
I’m surprised Reddit still allows edit and undelete and expect them to remove the functionality soon.
> I’m sure Reddit keeps all versions as well. But I think it would be impractical to restore to the correct version at scale unless they want to manually review to find the “right” version to restore.
If they retain versioning history I'm sure it would be easy to identify a mass edit and revert all of those edits from the user. If it wasn't easy, for some reason, it would probably be easy to revert all edits after, say, 2 days of posting.
Given that everything posted to Reddit becomes the property of Reddit (okay, perpetually licensed to Reddit), I don't know that much legally could be done about this. Unless they restored stuff posted while under-age, or PII, maybe.
Just need to update the script to also create new comments with random garbage, edit those to other random garbage, then delete. Add in some random delays between actions, randomize the order of all individual actions, and this would make it very difficult for admins to separate legitimate activity from script activity.
If on a new page those new comments would get downvoted to oblivion. If on an older page they'd be partially identifiable by dint of being on an older page.
But sure, things could be done to make this more difficult. It's probably not worthwhile on Reddit's part to do anything to stop this, just as it hasn't been too worthwhile for websites to evade ad blockers. The number of people who mass delete is just too small to matter.
If I worked at Reddit and wanted to do something about it though (and was a programmer), I'd add an option under individual deleted comments for viewers to click to view the comment (and any versions). And possibly add an option for viewers to restore a version entirely. This would save helpful comments, at least until some jerk decided to automate the process and restore everything. So maybe the complete restoration is a bad idea.
If I worked at Reddit and wanted to do something about it though (and was a programmer), I'd add an option under individual deleted comments for viewers to click to view the comment (and any versions).
That could still backfire. Users may be very unhappy that their unedited comments are accessible forever. This may drive them away from commenting and participating in general.
The goal of mass-deleters is to drive down engagement. If Reddit makes the entire edit history of each comment accessible, then mass deleters could flood that history with bogus, AI-generated crap. Although it may still be possible to determine which edit was the last real one, the effort to do so goes way up, and engagement goes down as a result.
> But I think it would be impractical to restore to the correct version at scale unless they want to manually review to find the “right” version to restore.
They could restore all comments a month after controversy/blackout events from about a month before such events.
That would probably restore the majority as most people are deleting/overwriting their comments as a reaction to or as a part of these events.
This is probably true, but at least one implication of what the program in the title does is edit your existing comments with something before marking them as deleted, because at some point (this is probably no longer true) Reddit did not store your entire comment history.
There are obviously ways to defeat this in analysis, but it does make Reddit's job slightly harder if they want to leverage that data. It would also probably be interesting to also just edit them and not delete them in some cases in some randomized way, which would make it even harder to reliably tease out good comments from noise.
Some time last year I attempted to make a similar tool. I was able to retrieve comments that had been deleted in the requests so I suspect that there is a "display flag" of sorts that is checked against.
That's applicable to personal information only. Everything a user posts to Reddit that isn't personal information, Reddit can use however they want.
>
You retain any ownership rights you have in Your Content, but you grant Reddit the following license to use that Content:
> When Your Content is created with or submitted to the Services, you grant us a worldwide, royalty-free, perpetual, irrevocable, non-exclusive, transferable, and sublicensable license to use, copy, modify, adapt, prepare derivative works of, distribute, store, perform, and display Your Content and any name, username, voice, or likeness provided in connection with Your Content in all media formats and channels now known or later developed anywhere in the world. This license includes the right for us to make Your Content available for syndication, broadcast, distribution, or publication by other companies, organizations, or individuals who partner with Reddit. You also agree that we may remove metadata associated with Your Content, and you irrevocably waive any claims and assertions of moral rights or attribution with respect to Your Content.
GDPR only applies to EU citizens though. If the data is truly valuable, I could imagine some work-arounds as well. E.g. maybe each reddit post is automatically a copyright work which you immediate give a perpetual license to reddit inc. You also automatically transfer copyright ownership to reddit inc and they license back your ability to share your comment.
GDPR only protects personal data. If someone requests deletion, you could probably keep the comments as long as you anonymize them (which Reddit does).
Your comments, including here in HN, are probably already covered by a scheme like that where you give the site operator an unrestricted license to use them. You can remove the association to your identity via GDPR, but to take down the content itself you’d need to go through the justice system.
Now, I'm not nessesarily advocating for it, but replacing all of your content with varying degrees of politically incorrect misinformation would be significantly more harmful to both Reddit and the GPT bots scraping its dataset than merely deleting the information.
Facebook used to do basically that - they gave you a $1000/month stipend if you lived within 5 miles of the office. A lot of other companies do it in more informal ways too, eg. I've heard of companies turning down applicants because they lived an hour and a half commute away from the office.
It has some mixed results. It's very positive for traffic and for climate change - if everyone goes from a 30 mile commute to a 5 mile one, that's 6x fewer vehicle miles traveled, 6x less car CO2 emissions, and 6x less traffic. But it also drives up rents around the office to crazy-high levels. Facebook's policy basically just boosted rents in Palo Alto by $1000/month (when they were there), and then it and the office location was single-handedly responsible for the gentrification of East Palo Alto (after they moved).
If I were to commute to my companies nearest office it’s about 1h20 or 60 miles.
Let’s assume I moved to near that office and lived in a high density area away from nature and dark skies. What does my wife do, who now faces an 80 mile commute the other way?
That's just what it boils down to: Add kids to the mix and you'll have them change schools (and their entire social circle) every time you do a career change - to earn more, to do something more interesting, or because you're simply forced to.
For anyone but singles, co-located work seems anachronistic. Worked back in the day were only one person in the family had a job, and jobs were held for decades (not years) I suppose. Today it seems ludicrous to expect anyone to move for work.
Which naturally leads into either long commutes or remote work. Having built several remote-first companies, I'm gonna say it's not perfect, but it really works.
This makes sense multiple perspectives: it's good for the climate to not make people burn gasoline every day (though this point may be lost on some people) and it's also good for the local community - both the employer needs to step his game up to assist and train people more since talent pool is limited and locals also need to step their game up since there are only so many local employers around (assuming all prefer to hire locally).
Going this way, if this were a law, would also prevent employers from treating people as expendable.
Flying people in from across the globe because they are marginally cheaper than the local work force never made sense to me.
Is that so bad? The other way of looking at it is that employers would be more likely to allow WFH, since they don't have to pay for your commute costs anymore
Any backdoor can be used by any government. It may take time, but it will be found and exploited. All they're doing is passing the buck... your buck, that is.
As a human that has only eyes, I've smashed the underside of my front bumper on many a curb over the years in various cars because just sight alone, blocked by the hood and front end of a car is a crappy way of judging things like that.
I say this as someone who absolutely loves his Model3.. but a step back is a step back, no matter how one spins it.
Radar-delete was a user experience negative for me as well. My autopilot experience today is far more 'jerky jerk' in terms of stop/go traffic than it ever was in the glory days of 'radar distancing data', so much so that AP is now banned on anything but 'smooth sailing highway driving' when I have certain motion sick vulnerable individuals in the car. Add on to that it's now (rightfully, given it's lost the radar available data) far more touchy about weather conditions before it'll even engage. :(
Your wording, especially the "Not true" puts it in your own voice.
Not to mention, just repeating Musk's statement in the context you did (as a response to someone explicitly disagreeing already) implies that you agree with it.
Warzones don't have a day shift and a night shift...
reply