"The key innovation lies in the microscopically small concentric rings that the researchers can pattern on the substrate. Unlike the ridges of FZPs (Fresnel Zone Plate), which are optimized for a single wavelength, the size and spacing of the flat lens' indentations keep the diffracted wavelengths of light close enough together to produce a full-color, in-focus image."
Yeah I read that, and upon re-reading it I have some vague idea on how that might work, but I would still need to read the paper and see some illustrations to really get it.
Sounds like this may enable full-colour astrophotography (always wondered why it's all in B&W!) and/or make achromatic telescopes a lot lighter.
I published a paper in this area a few years ago (but with a different lens design), so I think I can answer.
In conventional diffractive optics, the focal plane (where the sensor should be placed for a focused image) is wavelength-dependent. This means that you receive an in-focus image of the scene for a specific wavelength λ_i when your sensor is located a distance d_i from the lens [0]. By varying d_i you can scan the scene for all wavelengths even if your sensor is monochromatic. You get blurry versions of all other wavelengths as well, but the idea is to use computational techniques to separate these out.
Here, they've designed an optic which tries to eliminate the wavelength dependence of the lens focal plane. Instead of you place an RGB sensor at this one focal plane to get all the wavelengths.
You can use a regular bayer-matrix colour camera (or colour film) for astrophotography, it’s very common in amateur circles.
However, mono cameras and filters are also often used because the interesting colours are often not R,G,B of the visible spectrum but certain emission frequencies of hydrogen, silicon, oxygen and others. These are often combined to make false-colour images.
Filters also help penetrate light pollution by keeping only the frequencies you’re interested in and rejecting much of the light reflected by the atmosphere.
In addition, getting lenses to focus all frequencies of light equally well at the same time is quite tricky. For a mono camera with narrowband filters, this is less of a problem: you can focus precisely on one colour at a time and you can get away with simpler optics or cheaper glass.
It helped us a lot in narrowing down what the actual problem was. Getting confirmation from real people that the problem existed and what their feature requests and objections were also helped us a lot with the direction to take the product in.
"Ms. Yamashita first encountered danshari during her university years in Tokyo, when she studied yoga and Buddhist teachings that emphasized letting go of attachments. After graduating [...] she began applying these principles to declutter her own home."
"The envisioned indoor farm would grow fruits and vegetables inside a multilevel warehouse, maximizing yield per acre while minimizing environmental impacts through a controlled, closed-loop system."
Benn Jordan made a video about midinous a year ago where he explains that the author, Nornec who is a music producer, liked Nodal so much but wanted improvements so direly they just learnt to program and developed modinous [1].
So yes, it’s completely inspired by nodal and the research papers which were published about it. It basically aims to be a better nodal in a lot of way. Also great origin story.
They don't need to be reconciled, but they do differ, which suggests we might be able to find a framework which reconciles them.
GaloisSpinozaAquinas in Google yields (for me at least) the following HN thread: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39885475 , in which an attempt at "Algebraic Theology" not only provides such a subsuming (thanks to Galois Theory) framework, answering that particular question in the affirmative, but also raises many other questions which might be amusing to pursue. (I could summarise those Q's in this thread, if any of you all are more interested than the downvoters were)
[I will summarise that thread further up in this one, but as it was months ago it may take me an hour or two to page everything back in]
reply