Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | nire's comments login

> Running in single-node-mode with an _in memory_ database (for our integration tests) is still slower than postgresql.

Can you share your numbers to have some kind of order of magnitude for this difference?


Great opportunity to work with a well funded start-up and create some awesome financial algorithms.


SwissBorg | Lausanne, Switzerland | Scala Engineers | Fulltime

We have recently reached our ICO hard cap and raised 50M$ and we are now working hard to deliver on our promises. For doing so, we are looking for passionate Scala engineers and security engineers to build the new era of wealth management on the blockchain.

What we offer is:

* Competitive salary

* An energetic work environment with a high grade of autonomy and growth opportunities. Tons of knowledge to be learnt about the growing blockchain industry, investment strategies in cryptoassets, algorithmic trading.

* Possibility to work on different projects building trading tools, analytical tools, investment strategies research, mobile apps and experimenting with new technologies

* Very competitive Salary and Bonus

For more details, please visit https://jobs.lever.co/swissborg


Have been running it in production for two different start-ups - very happy with it. The pain really comes from setting-up GPG correctly to have encryption.


Surprised to see Wal-E only supports GPG for encryption.

When backing up to S3, KMS has a ton of advantages.

Though in that vein, maybe the native S3 encryption at at rest with KMS is sufficient?


Would be awesome if Flickr or 500px would use this kind of tech.


I'm one of the conf organizers: we were on a budget and didn't record any talk. Will try to fix that for next year.


Recording a talk only takes a phone these days? I know I know it won't be professional recording but I have good luck with just recording from the front row.


It won't be a recording that you could bear listening to. Even more professional setups/bigger conferences often screw up the audio so that the recording is basically binnable.


Can't you just record the audio via whatever computer the mic is attached to?

Syncing video to audio is always a pain, but I wouldn't mind desync to see it.


Yeah but for some reason they don't always do this. Also in case they actually do that part right, they often don't give people who ask questions a mic and don't repeat their questions. Then you don't have any idea what the presenter is talking about.


I agree. A cheap (iPhone) recording is still better than nothing.


Absolutely, things are changing.


Yup, just set a new PrintStream(new ByteArrayOutputStream()) in System.setOut() and you're good.


this is cool !


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: