What is an acceptable signal to noise ratio for a security tool to be useful? clearly some amount of false positives to any real threat ratio causes people to just ignore it completely. Cue me looking at my npm vulnerabilities with I install packages lol.
We’re not talking about thermal noise here. Each and every signal has a determinate source. You need to go through each and every one, but doing this effectively often involves paying lots of money to “some nerds” (rather than your own in house supplicants) and that’s where this kind of thing usually falls down.
Unless they accidentally hit a vein and inject the vaccine directly into the bloodstream, anecdotal evidence[0] points to this for young men who get myocarditis. They often report tasting saline in their mouth shortly after the injection.
The age and sex disparity in post-vac myocarditis would seem to disqualify that hypothesis. It's not like young men have veins in their deltoids where other demographics don't.
Tasting saline after an IV injection in nonsensical.
Mapbox is the probably the best GL based mapping client but it is no longer free on the latest version. Although, its not designed to work with PostGIS explicitly you definitely can. (i.e. querying mvts, map tiles, through PostGIS)
Leaflet as others have said is another good option, but is really made for old slipply map tiles.
Most of the ESRI based web clients I think look and feel terrible IMO. Rendering just looks off. What features are you looking for in a mapping client?
This money isn't going to facebook though? Facebook doesn't even take a cut of it. I imagine fb's intentions were to let the customer know that if 30% of the effective donation/payment had not gone to the recipient it wasn't fb taking a cut.
