A judge hearing a routine administrative order in the English insolvency courts spied something amiss in the drafting and the judgement takes us through the perils of a) poor chatbot use and b) the reputational risk of said use.
apparently their goal is to take part of the 60 trillion dollar labor market that includes fast food order takers, IT professionals, hotel front desk workers, etc. There is plenty of payroll they can target
Those offences also include, as well as ‘hurty words’, threats to kill, bomb hoaxes and harassment matters.
The legislation covers all types of communications including phone calls and letters, and because the authors haven’t bothered to drill down into the stats it is impossible to pick out the ‘hurty word’ offences from (for example) someone threatening to rape and murder an MP on X, or engaging in a campaign of harassment against their ex-partner.
reply