Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | multipass's commentslogin

All these "awesome list of ..." maybe means that there is a need for a site like Yahoo in the 90's which tried to catalogize internet in a hierarchical list-of-lists manner.


And then you quite quickly get to a point when you need to curate an "awesome list of awesome lists" like https://github.com/sindresorhus/awesome or "awesome list of awesome lists of awesome lists" like https://github.com/t3chnoboy/awesome-awesome-awesome ...



> This list is incomplete; you can help by expanding it.


In theory once you get a "awesome list of awesome lists" you can just add subsections to it.


Just so long as there is never a requirement for a subsection of "awesome lists that do not contain themselves".


I agree that it's needed.

The problem with those kind of sites is that the site owners try to game the ranking system.


These lists get far more Github stars than actual software...same problem here.


You keep the curators to 5-6 experts in each field, with a reputation for being straight.

If they do any tempering, expel them.

This requires a rich person to pay them, or a community to motivate them, which gives the super-power to an agreeable, but fair BDFL.


This already exists. The problem is how to find it, since on the surface it looks the same as all the junk lists


Well, people trying it, getting good results, and thus creating word of mouth for it, should be enough.


Well, the list of tools is at least as useful as the most useful tool on the list, and probably reflects the overall usefulness of its category. Which means that if we go enough levels farther, the master list of lists [of lists...] would reflect the overall usefulness of all software on GitHub.

Also maybe GitHub needs a "list of stuff" category, so these lists of things don't muddle search results and conversely can be searched for easily. Curated lists of links are generally quite useful and putting it all in a public vcs with a pull request infrastructure makes it easy to contribute.


I definitely see a usefullness in these lists, I just feel sad that they get a lot more attention than actual code repositiories.

Indeed, Github should find a solution for this. I didn't care much about Github stars but recently I noticed they're being required in various scenarios, for example some CDN require a certain number of Github stars to include a library [1]

[1] https://github.com/cdnjs/cdnjs/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#b...


I don't think Github stars should be considered as anything more than built-in bookmarking. Personally, I only use them that way. With this view, it's obvious why lists get more stars than the projects listed.


> the list of tools is at least as useful as the most useful tool on the list.

Simple disproof: a list of everything is not more useful than the most useful thing, because navigating the list has a cost.

Also, an analogy: would you eat a bowl of candy that had the best piece of candy in the world and also the most poisonous substance (malware)?


I agree. It seems no algorithm could kill "curators" yet.


Well, Github could select an official list per technology, move it to eg. the github.com/explore part and reward the curator with money or software licenses/subscriptions.


What if I'd like something that the arbitrary community manager of GitHub doesn't? Why would a software project management site be the arbiter of good software?


dmoz was that site for a long time after yahoo became it's 2000s incarnation, but then dmoz went away, there are a couple of live archives of it, but still...


It appears that dmoz was resurrected as https://www.curlie.org/


But these lists also already fulfill the need. When there's a category of something people are interested in someone will eventually make an "awesome list of ...". The good lists become popular and become included in various "awesome list of lists" improving their discoverability, while the bad lists fade into obscurity. And since there is no central authority and plenty of alternatives each list can be opinionated instead of including everything under the sun.

These lists follow the same "survival of the fittest" that underlies capitalism and evolution, and while coordinated efforts have many advantages they also have all the disadvantages of monoliths. I think a Yahoo-like site would have a hard time producing a better result.


Free markets mostly work because people vote with their dollars. Democracies mostly work because people vote with their votes. Web democracies fail because votes are trivial to manipulate and gamed by SEO.


But web dictatorships work great because switching costs are low, so if a dictator doesn't deliver people just go somewhere else. While centralized link lists are often democratic, awesome lists form a network of dictatorships.


I made a site that attempts to be a quick, hierarchical overview of the software tool landscape and the bevy of alternatives: https://www.tooltldr.com


Anyone with experiences running the Huawei Matebook?


Yeah, I have it. Linux works great, except the function key layer and stereo sound on the built-in speakers due to the unusual audio chipset.

Performance is fantastic, the keyboard is passable, the screen looks beautiful, and build quality seems on par with my 2010 MacBook pro, and definitely better than my Lenovo Thinkpad.


Apple have to consider themselves lucky Huawei isn't having an easy time in the US. In my opinion they are better than Apple in design and hardware. I wonder how much lobbying Apple does against Huawei in the mobile market.


and in Python >=3.3, IOError is an alias for OSError.


Wonder how this will affect Chinese citizens that have used and trusted Opera Mini to bypass censorship and the great firewall of China in the past. What browsing history is kept by the Opera Mini servers?


Opera mini runs Chinese servers separately. If ppl use Opera mini in mainland China, their activity is already on servers which the gov has a legal access to.


Opera mini , specifically , uses it's servers to render mobile optimized pages, so all of the search history is on the servers.


"The study was inspired by the case of McArthur Wheeler, a man who robbed two banks after covering his face with lemon juice in the mistaken belief that, because lemon juice is usable as invisible ink, it would prevent his face from being recorded on surveillance cameras."


I like the inclusion of the word "mistaken". You know, just in case anyone reading gets any ideas...


Since it took a while to find out how to set this up using duplicity to backup the home directory under Ubuntu Linux, here is how I got this to work. Maybe this can be of help for somebody: https://gist.github.com/molobrakos/ff1620ce6031c99f120b


What I love about the Contour+2 is that the battery is compatible with old Nokia phone batteries, which makes it very cheap to have a bunch of charged batteries in reserve.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: