Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | mobiclick's comments login

My problem with this laptop isn't with it's pricing but with who's selling it. If it was Asus or some other reputable OEM, I think I would have bought it.

I've had extremely poor experiences with some Chinese OEMs in the past and I'm not risking 1500 with unproven OEMs unless I have to.


The only browser that allows me to use any addon I want. I'll continue to use it until Mozilla fulfill their promise and allow me to load any addon I want.

Fitness for use trumps security.


Your fetish is another man's means of leaving.


Hear, hear!

I once was denied access to my own money over a very long weekend during which a bill popped up that I had to settle immediately. I ultimately ended up borrowing money from my family.

The reason for the denail turned out to be a clerical mistake.

The feeling of dread I experienced thanks to this tought me to always kept a small stash of cryptocurrency (and cash!) for situations like this.

In the age of uncaring mega corporations and unaccountable governments, having money not controllable by either is a necessity.


How would you have used crypto to pay that bill that popped up (???) and you had to settle immediately (???)?

Or to pay for anything else, for that matter.


Here in AU there are a few companies which let you pay any bill with crypto (ie; you send them crypto and they pay the bill using conventional means).

https://www.finder.com.au/crypto-bill-payments

There are probably equivalent companies in most markets.


I wouldn't have been able to for that emergancy bill specifically. I would have used cash.

However had I had more time to liquidate my crypto, I definitely would have used crypto. I know two people wouldn't mind buying my crypto with traditional currency.


I do the exact opposite, I use cash for everything and keep some in the bank for ordering things online. That way I dont have to really worry ababout it much at all.


It's not denial so much as it is not caring to the point where you get upset. I think that's the strength of mind that GP is referring to.


I agree. Just because we have more advanced diagnosis and detection tools these days doesn't mean everything has to be a problem. The internet has really shaken up social norms and signaling and the kids are the first ones to enter the new world. I believe once we have a generation of fully formed 30-50 year olds who grew up with this strange social media, then we'll have the proper understandings and social knowledge to handle it well. Kinda like how parents these days can attempt to relate to their kids in high school. We need the elder wisdom there.

But I do believe that right now we're kinda off track. We almost venerate the act of being hurt. Everyone likes attention and nothing gets such protection by certain classes as having been offended or wronged by some other class. Social signals are currently built to display virtue and so people will go out of their way to display their support of the wronged. I _do_ believe that this is the correct direction to move from where we were, but I think it's gone a little too far and needs time to rebound.

Being a victim is the fastest way to go from zero to hero (reach millions of people) these days and it's also seemingly the least likely way to backfire. People are much more hesitant to bring up the wrongs of someone who's currently being defended for fear of ending up being placed in the out group and ostracized from the signaling group.


This all contributes to a social custom of looking to be wronged, so that you may point out the evil of the person/generation/world. However, people aren't idiots and can _sometimes_ tell if you're just faking for clout. This leads to a feedback loop of needing to be really hurt, seeing other people be really hurt, believing your really hurt, and finally internalizing that pain and trauma. Things do hurt, bad words are called bad for a reason. Society might be better if we were all nice. But every bad word and every microaggression does not need to become such a large roadblock to personal freedom. People are chaining themselves to the road with this stuff. Dieing on hills that require them to have been personally wronged, using their own pain as a way to shut down criticism. Yes, people hurt, and things can be bad. But it's also entirely possible to see something hurtful and continue life without it hurting you. It's 100% doable to actually not be hurt, not just ignore it, but to construct a self esteem and understanding that allows you to not be shanked by every half difficult social interaction that occurs.

Mental health awareness is good. But social signals lead individuals to believing they must be hurt to be a part of the in group. Virtue through suffering is an incredibly effective signaling mechanism


Im not saying you should broadcast your woes to the world for fake internet points. Just that people should be ok with having a bad day sometimes and that people who think they are too "strong" to ever be sad, usually are the most screwed up mentally.


I would suggest that anyone who cares so little that there is literally nobody who can say anything that hurts them is basically dead inside.

Part of living is opening yourself up to people. That includes the risk of getting hurt. That's normal and part of the human experience.


I don't think anyone in this thread is denying this.


Guess the israelis are doing their darnest to get them to try a fourth time.


Nearly all the Arab countries have since signed peace deals with Israel, with Syria and Iran being the only exceptions.

No one is going to invade Israel.

Palestinians should sign the last peace deal. They aren't going to get better terms.


Isreal has a well established history of not honoring treaties so I don't see why Arab countries would be expected to honor their end of the deal.

The Palestinians will probably do the right thing and preserver until the israelis cross yet another red line. Let's just hope - for the israelis sake - that they don't cross a line to far.


This comment comes off as incredibly biased in multiple different ways.

The most obvious contradiction is that you think Israel will regret crossing the "red line", yet also claim that they are already crossing red lines.


This thread wouldn't make much sense if your proverbial red line was already crossed, now would it ;)


But it's leaps and bounds more private than any VPN including this (no shade on these guys, if I ever need a VPN that isn't tor, I'll choose them). E

To me, comparing tor's privacy features against normal VPN is like comparing a jet plane to a tricycle


Applicants specify their preferred time slots in decending order and the government agency chooses the time. This is how the my country does it.


I'd take a shitty ui over a shiny ui backed by an unpredictable algorithm any day.

That people would prioritize ui and initial setup costs over payment processing reliability is insane to me.


I really wish bubblewrap had a way to mount filesystems as copy-on-write instead of read-only.

Having ways to impose limits on memory would be nice too.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: