Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | midtake's commentslogin

Then don't. No one is putting a gun to your head and making you use groomer Discord or roblox aka pedoblox. Pedoblox is a fetid swamp of groomers that needs to be nuked from orbit.

I do. I verify it so hard I've begun to mistrust it lately, seeing Gemini make glaring conceptual mistakes and refusing to align to my corrections.

I honestly just want Intel to fail. I believe they have done more anticompetitive harm than good these past years. Datacenter needs to move to ARM so Intel can finally go home.

Sure they might be repairable now, but after Superfish I can't trust Lenovo.

This was my thought as well. I'm surprised people are so easy to forgive and forget

Edit: a link[1] for those that aren't familiar

[1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superfish#Lenovo_security_inci...


Looks like it only affected their consumer lines and not the ThinkPads.

Didn’t Dell and Sony have similar controversies?


I don't trust Asahi after the whole Asahi Lina thing. Lina being an alt in denial of her other identity is a big red flag. If Hector was honest about it I would feel differently. The deception behind the Lina identity is very weird to me.

> According to Discord, only a small number of users were part of this test, in which any information submitted could be stored for up to seven days before it would be deleted.

Ah yes, we only store it for 7 days. During those 7 days, we pass it to Persona, and who knows how long they keep it!


Discord's previous statement:

> "Identity documents submitted to our vendor partners are deleted quickly— in most cases, immediately after age confirmation"

So now it's not "immediately" but 7 days? I don't know how anyone can trust any statement from these guys.


"I don't know how anyone can trust any statement from these guys."

this is the fun part, you can't!


The way I read that is Discord would delete your data, but they were taking an intentionally hands off approach to the data broker they subcontracted to identify you.

The one thing you can trust is this:

If a tech company says something to you, and they don't give you the means to verify it on your own, they are lying to you. Do not trust anything they say, ever.


Shit like that makes me cringe. Muh food. Already I know what kind of shallow life the author leads, one full of inessential frippery, whose discussions over dinner or drink never orbit anything actually substantial.

What shall we decide on the important matters of eating or drinking tonight fellow humans???

At this point I'm rooting for the AI models.


This used to be more common right? Back in the winmodem days?

Fuck AirData. All my homies hate AirData.

The article seems to be overreacting to a small part of Pope Leo's talk. It seems to me his real point was that using AI to hasten writing homilies leads priests to treat this work as busy work instead of thoughtful, focused work.

> overreacting to a small part of [a Pope]'s talk

As is Catholic tradition in the US


Priests who use generative AI to craft their homilies should openly share the prompts they rely on, because those prompts shape the theology, tone, and pastoral direction of what is proclaimed from the pulpit. In a community rooted in trust and accountability—especially within the Catholic Church—transparency about AI use is not optional but a moral obligation.

— ChatGPT.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: