Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | mdbmdb's comments login

wow $7k/yr for 2 cars. That's crazy expensive

I'm running a team of SDE's and, from my experience, bringing development in-house is the last resort simply because of high risk/high cost. You have to pay your devs hell or high water whether they are moving at a rocket or turtle speed. We have worked with oil&gas and logistics customers, and their in-house development always drags 2-3 times longer than expected. If your pocket can allow it - you may try it but about 80% of customers I have worked with or talked to moved from in-house development to outsourcing it.

My team would love to look at your project for free just to give you an option to consider. Feel free to contact me at Polarwind99@gmail.com


I would be interested. I think LinkedIn aggressively tries to shut down things like you are trying to build though


Good to know. Can you share your email id? I will ping you as soon as I have the first version of application ready.


Nothing stops them but it doesn't happen overnight. These laws have been in place for a long long time. Women weren't allowed to drive in Dubai until 2018 but it changed. Changes will come but not in a blink of an eye


I'm happy to keep my dumb 45' TV for as long as I can. Speaking of which, is it still possible to buy a large diagonal dumb TV these days? like 65' or 75'


I recently learned that some Google TVs have a “Basic Mode” that removes all the smart crud. https://www.androidcentral.com/new-google-tv-feature-will-le...

I haven’t had a chance to look into it further so I don’t know if it’s any good, but it might be worth looking into. (I’m also curious if anyone here has experience with it)


Every TV is just a dumb panel if you don't give it an IP address.


It's only a matter of time before TVs come come with cellular modems, with the network cost paid for by splitting the surveillance dollars with the cell company.



I wonder if I can extract the chip and get free internet.


Just don't plug it


Just when you thought that LinkedIn couldn't get any worse. Is this really the innovative idea that a professional networking platform should focus on ?

It's already looking like Facebook with all the "Like if" and "Agree?" posts.

They also confirmed it via TechCrunch: https://techcrunch.com/2024/03/16/linkedin-wants-to-add-gami...


what price are you looking to sell for?


Is it able to provide data on extreme events. Say, the current and potential path of a hurricane? similar to .kml that NOAA provides


Extreme weather is predicted by numerical weather models. Correctly representing hurricanes has driven development on the NOAA GFS model for centuries.

Open-Meteo focuses on providing access to weather data for single locations or small areas. If you look at data for coastal areas, forecast and past weather data will show severe winds. Storm tracks or maps are not available, but might be implemented in the future.


I would love to hear about this centuries-old NOAA GFS model. The one I know about definitely doesn't have that kind of history behind it.


Some of the oldest data may come from ships logs back to 1836

https://www.reuters.com/graphics/CLIMATE-CHANGE-ICE-SHIPLOGS...


Sorry, decades.

KML files for storm tracks are still the best way to go. You could calculate storm tracks yourself for other weather models like DWD ICON, ECMWF IFS or MeteoFrance ARPEGE, but storm tracks based on GFS ensembles are easy to use with sufficient accuracy


Appreciate the response. Do you know of any services that provide what I described in the previous comments? I'm specifically interested in extreme weather conditions and their visual representation (hurricanes, tornados, hails etc.) with API capabilities


Go to: nhc.noaa.gov/gis There's a list of data and products with kmls and kmzs and geojsons and all sorts of stuff. I haven't actually used the API for retrieving these, but NOAA has a pretty solid track record with data dissemination.


Torrent -> NAS -> Plex -> My TV


I don't understand. I literally just copy-pasted the "Is 17077 a prime number? Think step by step." question in my GPT-4 and it wrote me a full-page response with step-by-step explanation.

The author is claiming that "the latest version of GPT-4 did not generate intermediate steps and instead answered incorrectly with a simple "No." but that is not the case


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: