Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | madaxe_again's commentslogin

Go on, without looking it up, name the three dominant schools of Islam.

And what? If someone said "some Muslims haven't even stopped slavery today," my statement would apply equally there.

Mormons who have Mormon friends in the judiciary.

The sad thing is that you also lose at least 4% in real world actions by practicing kindness.

I'm 42. I have found that a depressingly large number of times in my life, being kind has got me precisely nowhere, whilst turning around and being decidedly unkind has made people move. I still always prefer kindness, and only resort to cruelty when kindness does not work - and to be clear this isn't some kind of "you are not bending to my impetuous whim", rather "you are not doing the one thing that you are being paid to do".

I've also found the same applies to me. The squeaky wheel gets the grease.

So - I think the LLMs are just responding accurately to a real social phenomenon.


Europeans who arrived, seized land, imported enslaved people, broke treaties, then later decided that later arrivals were the real problem? Those Europeans?

Would you prefer the United States didn’t exist or something? What is even the point of this comment. “Bad things happened in history, there was violence and war and conquering, woe is me” this is what you sound like. Profound, truly.

You're Navajo, are you?

Did you roll a dice and pick one or are you actually familiar with Navajo history or something and that’s why you tried to use this retort as a way to imply you’re not allowed to have opinions on American immigration policy unless you’re from a Native American tribe?

[flagged]


There it is.

Man, in the UK you can’t even get a frigging cat without having several inspections of your home and interviews to confirm that you will be a fit “parent”.

I mean, I’m all for safeguarding in principle - but it evidently doesn’t bloody work.

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c5y0xz424v1o


Individual examples of the process not working doesn't mean it's overall a bad process. If you expect perfection, no adoption would ever occur.

I’d say raping your adopted kid is not just a little slip up, and to brush that with “nobody’s perfect” is… well, you do you.

How do you prove with absolute certainty that a given person will never rape anyone?

You don’t, but you pay attention when a kid repeatedly shows up in hospital with mystery injuries, which happened in this case. Nobody paid attention until the kid was dead.

You could also have at home unscheduled social worker visits. Intrusive, sure, but it’s a) something you’d be knowingly opting into through adoption and b) likely mostly focussed on early years.


> Nobody paid attention until the kid was dead

Then the question is how often that happens. Is this an outlier, the 0.0001% where all of the signs were missed, and everything failed?

Or does this happen regularly?


Next year: Congress bans the Fourier transform.

Don’t joke about that, you’ll give them ideas. particularly as Fourier is credited with discovering the greenhouse effect.

Oh no, I read a book which credited the greenhouse effect to Von Humboldt years ago and have been misinforming people ever since

Lol nah. The assets are held by a trust. The trust, being a friendly bunch, loan you capital which it gets by liquidating assets, at a rate of 0% with “don’t worry about it” default terms. You’ll probably pay a management fee for each loan.

You croak, your heirs become the beneficiaries of the trust. Rinse, repeat.


In this case, the beneficiaries of the trust pay income tax on the money they receive from the trust.

You don’t pay income tax on loans, and the trust exists in a place with no CGT.

It doesn't matter where the trust exists, what matters is that the people drawing from the trust pay income taxes on that money.

“Parsons again resorted to bootlegging nitroglycerin for money”

How does this man not have a movie?


He has a TV show called Strange Angel, and it's pretty good. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strange_Angel

I think far closer is “people want to be part of the in-group”.

Closer yet is “look at me! I am sexy and cool! Have sex with me!”.

“Taste” is social signalling, end to end, so strike me down.

I say this as someone who gets writeups of their work in design magazines fairly often - and I am not a designer - it’s just like dressing a theatre set with the correct objects to signal the thing you want to signal.

Fuck, I fed people cat food at a dinner party when I was 20 and they all said it was delicious pâté.

All artifice.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: