That strategy could really burn you if a Democratic anti-MAGA candidate wins the next election.
To the private citizen, silence is usually the best option and we should push for that option to exist. All attempts at digital ID or mandatory self doxxing work against the freedom of the individual.
... until you realize that the LLM-generated code doesn't even compile, or you need a PhD to write all the prompts needed to have a prototype instead of the real thing.
youre probably right... for the public market, anyway. blackhat state actors would probably not mind having something like that. but they'd never talk about it in public.
or maybe its not even neccesary, and doing something akin to fuzzing syscalls 'but smartly' probably yields more results.
Indeed that was the point of my joke, it isn’t just an hypothetical situation but a quite real scenario that will probably tried in court against Mamdani in the following months.
I just wonder how widespread fraud is without any form of ID.
A fake utility bill is just a few clicks away on my PC.
Govt surveillance? I'm much more worried by the ever increasing number of cameras in the streets rather than something similar to having a passport to prove who you really are.
I have used my company LLM thingy. Able to summarize and document code leveraging remarks and general code behavior just because LLM just ingested the full python docs.
About generating things well... it just copypastes the same snippets you could find on stackoverflow, including bugs - if the task you throw at it has already been answered.
For complete and complex code... well it spews out the same useless advice you could get from a drunk non expert person while sitting at the bar.
Issue is... LLMs are too big to fail, everyone just poured billions in this huge statistics bean counter, and... someone has to justify those expenses at board meetings.
