Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | lvl155's commentslogin

Why don’t they just allow MacOS on iPad Pro. It’s what people want.

Stating the obvious - because keeping them separate means Apple gets to double-dip on people buying more or less the same hardware twice.

I thought I wanted this. And in fact, I turned on the 'window' option for my iPad Pro when it came out. I did not, in fact, want this. The iPad just has totally different ergonomics, even with keyboard / trackpad / etc. Anyway, for years I've been convinced that would be the perfect combo - but in my own tests, - meh - At the very least, new hardware needs to be built that gives laptop-grade typing and trackpad. With that, then it would be upside - but I'm not sure that it would be that much cheaper than just having two devices.

Why don’t they just allow MacOS on iPad Pro. It’s what people want.

Who wants it? On my iPad I want an iPad OS, MacOS is not good for touch operation. MS tried merging two OS-es (surface) and see how it went.

Because this way they sell two for the price of two.

The ipad pro with keyboard is $1300, more than 2x the price of the Neo. Definitely not the same product category.

People come up with the most insane workflow for agents. They complete about 80% of the work but that last 20% is basically equivalent to you doing the whole thing piece wise (with the help of AI). Except the latter gives you peace of mind.

I am still not sold on agentic coding. We’ll probably get there within the next couple of years.


I'm curious what you've used it for? I was firmly in your camp until about a month ago when i used codex to dust off an old side project. I hadn't touched the project in six months. This was literally my first prompt:

"Explain the codebase to a newcomer. What is the general structure, what are the important things to know, and what are some pointers for things to learn next?"

Once I saw the output I giddyup'd and haven't looked back.


Only Meta and Zuck would continually introduce invasive products.

I canceled my subscription though I still have a lot of money in API (which I know they don’t refund). I will sundown and move it all over to Anthropic/Google. It’s pretty clear to me what OAI is doing. Shame on anyone working there selling their souls for a few more pennies.

Shame because Codex was a bit better for me in the past few weeks but not enough to justify spending my money on them.


...seems to me you should try to spend down those credits first, even if it's on something completely useless. Otherwise you're giving them free money (they never had to spend the compute).

Might be the best thing to happen to Anthropic from a PR perspective and possibly IPO.

That depends on how aggressively the current administration follows through on the threats to punish them. The SEC could deny IPO registration, for example.

Given the waning influence of American economic hegemony, this threat looks to be less impactful as time goes on. A stick that is shrinking can still be painful; it will be an interesting decision for the company's directors to make.

Good press is helpful, but public investors also care about regulatory risk

At this point, surveillance state is coming whether Dario does this or not. You can do all that with open source models. It’s sad that we don’t have the right people in charge in govt to address this alarming issue.

Think LLM by itself is basically a commodity at this point. Not quite interchangeable but it’s more of artistic differences rather than technological. I used to think it was data and that would give companies like Google a leg up.


I am pretty sure we are still attracting top talents. We are not, however, attracting good to mediocre talents. Is that a good thing? What’s going to happen to all these mediocre graduate programs spread out all over the country where they simply existed to satiate foreign demand?


So basically you are saying Anthropic models are indispensable but you are too cheap to pay for it.


Nowhere did I say they're indispensable, and I explicitly said I'm still paying for it. If all AI companies disappear tomorrow that's fine. I'm just calling out what I think is tone-deaf move, by a company I pay a large monthly bill to.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: