Fully agree. I have the same impression. Especially, the last couple of days I've experienced an increase of submissions from accounts which were not even 1 hour old. All just promoting some fishy ai generated bs.
This is pretty cool. Would be interested in the scientific review later on... I reckon, that just the increased awareness amongst smokers might account for a decrease of butts by 15 to 25%.
No, you didn't. Nothing free, not 100... You just created a false claim, that your overpriced service might generate up to a far-fetched 100 backlinks. Just another marketing bs service made by ai slop.
Is it project-unrelated, that you ran into limits so quickly? If it's just in some repos, it might be a bloated claude.md. Looking forward reading from you, if you get some helpful insights
It is all related, it happens in the middle of a debug session where it just stops responding with no error message and my last message remains in the chat window.
i have to then start a new session and explain the context of pervious session and Claud goes on to ask for more context from the code and then by the time I get to any new code the session does what i explained above. i don’t allow Cluade to access my code directly its only via chat ui interaction. My usage data in the settings shows I have used less than 4% of alloted tokens
Ok. This isn't something I experienced, but it sounds strange. Are you using the Claude desktop client (electron app)? This thing is quite buggy and unreliable.. Or is the described behaviour in claude.ai browser input existent as well?
I can confirm. It was roughly until 00:30 GMT no rate limits applied. (Pro Plan with Opus) And it took some time extra for them after usage limit applied again, that you were able to see the usage.
Difficult. On the one hand, the image of Maduro in cuffs seems odd, e.g. the left side of the overear protection merging with the background and other things. On the other hand, I find it still hard to believe, that the whole world is sharing ai generated images and my brain tries to mark those oddities as some normal photo effects due to low quality camera or something else. This is really difficult to decide, whether or not those images are trustworthy.
I would bet, even when the fbi is able to track down archive.today, it will be a matter of hours until the archive is shifted to another network and reinstated.. Even though if a certain amount of archived data might be lost, the core service will be rehosted quite fast somewhere else, i would think.
Reading the short article it feels like the old routine of 1. Cyber incident, 2. sparse information in all directions, 3. after fixed, all personnel returns to old habits with higher level of insecurity against a blurry, unspecific threat and back to square one. while the few sec op folks try to train employees to better secure the systems without really improving the crucial understanding of how such incidents really work. Or do I completely misinterpret such causalities?
Grokipedia is a joke. Lot of articles I've checked are AI slop at its worst and at the bottom it says "The content is adapted from Wikipedia, licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License."
reply