Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | lolbase's comments login

It is beyond parody to refer to "not giving money that was not earned" as acting in an "adversarial capacity".

Your argument is completely detached from reality, and devoid of logic.


My argument is that perceptions matter more than reality. Disagreeing on the grounds that my argument is not reality is not a dismissal, but I certainly understand that you do not perceive things as such. You are only one anecdote out of many.


The government shouldn’t give out billion dollar participation trophies.

There’s a set of metrics to meet. Starlink is moving the wrong way against those metrics. As such, they’ll need to succeed unaided in the marketplace, instead of getting a government handout.


Perhaps not billion dollar, but shouldn’t it give some participation trophies? How else to entice innovation in certain areas, especially when the interest rates are killing small tech outfits.


No, it should not.


Agreed. The FCC shouldn't be giving out any funds. They should stick to their role as regulator. Starlink as a properly grounded libertarian outfit should have lobbied to have any subsidy role by the FCC discontinued. Starlink should have just competed in the broadband marketplace - as should have everyone else. In such a level playing field, I think Starlink would do just fine.


LEO space is a limited global resource. I think government should regulate (and sometimes subsidy) to avoid it become a private company's suck.


> I think government should regulate

That would just move it from private company suck to nation-state suck. It needs to be regulated by the International Telecommunication Union (UN).


I agree with this. But we have to operate in the world that exists and not necessarily the one that we wish to exist.


Good point. Based on the latest internal valuation, Elon only destroyed $25b in the first year.


Internal valuations can predict market prices of currently private companies? That’s amazing, someone should go make billions off that


Perhaps it could be compared to _just_ FedWire. But even then, FedWire handles about $4t of transfers per day. That's a couple orders of magnitude more than BitCoin.

And that's literally one service, from one bank.


That is a reasonable comparison. Bitcoin can do that much volume as well (without much change in water “usage”). The difference being that one is controlled by the US government and one is not.


Bitcoin can handle $4T in transfers a day?


At ~700,000 transactions per day, if the avg txn value is $6M, then yes.


superautomatics provide similar benefits with less environmental impact.

Unfortunately, most people prefer the lower up-front cost and higher operational cost of a Keurig or a Nespresso to the higher up-front cost and lower operational cost of a superauto.


You can do this with most direct indexing solutions.


   Tesla 3 - up to 4065. 
   Tesla S - up to 4941.
   Tesla X - up to 5531.
   Tesla Y - up to 4416.
   Chevy Bolt - 3563.
   Leaf - up to 3853.
   Mach-E - up to 4920.
   ID.4 - up to 4848.
   E-Tron - up to 5754.
   BMW iX - up to 5659.
   Taycan - up to 5121
   Kona EV - up to 3715.


I like how you just excluded all the comparable EVs. Here they are for completeness, most coming close to or topping out the standard 7k where they will post "No Trucks" signs.

   Ford Lightning - 6,893
   Hummer EV - 9,063
   Rivian R1T - 7,148
   Lordstown Endurance - 6,450
   Chevrolet Silverado EV - 8,532
   RAM 1500 REV - est. 7,500
   Alpha Wolf - 7,088


Your claim was about “Most EVs”. I listed the most popular EVs, without edits.


Two things:

1) the backup is likely a high end rewards / corporate card whose fees are as high or higher than Amex for most categories of spend; and

2) it’s kind of weak for the last interaction with a business be them saying they won’t take your preferred form of payment because they imagine it boosts their margin by .3%.


> Musk has explicitly and repeatedly said that his standard for free speech is that which complies with the law in any given country.

Yet he has repeatedly demonstrated that this is not, in fact, his standard for free speech. It’s bizarre to pretend that it is.


And if you want to find somebody saying that some people should not exist on the planet, you can find the CEO retweeting it, or replying with something like "this is the actual truth".


you can find comments like this too but they get community note'd for taking things out of context


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: