Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | labria's commentslogin

I think you missed the point here. They were not talking about _making the choice_ to return to the office, but rather about _accepting the ultimatum_. There’s nothing wrong with deciding you want to work from the office, it’s the ultimatum part that’s important IMO.


What is the difference between "making a choice" and "accepting an ultimatum" in the case of an employee working at a company where an RTO policy is enacted?

The only point of a invective like the original article is to try to make people who are perfectly fine commuting into an office feel like they are traitors to some fictitious worker solidarity organization. Like some red-eyed Sauron entity with no motivation other than pure evil in their soul is threatening to steal the food from their babies mouths unless they comply. The blackness and whiteness of this moral viewpoint is extremely toxic.

If you have a strong preference to work from home and your employer springs an "ultimatum" on you then what you actually have is a choice. How you make that choice should be much more nuanced than "asshole exerting power" vs. "dehumanized submission". And if the balance of factors, whatever they may be, lead you to decide to go back to the office - don't let some ideological zealot turn that decision into some moral absolute.


Tag with [video], please


I'm pretty sure all of them mean the exact same thing, they just alternate for the notes to be less repetitive.


The last line reads like something Clippy would say :)


According to web archive, it happened somewhere between October and mid-November: The last time it was up: https://web.archive.org/web/20221021050048/https://www.storj... The first time it's gone: https://web.archive.org/web/20221114070255/https://www.storj...


There should be a public canary watcher, to notice dead canaries sooner.


It looks like the EFF had one. [1] Though, the website currently does not load, and from archive.org, it looks like they killed the project sometime before July 2021. [2]

[1] https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2016/05/canary-watch-one-year-...

[2] https://web.archive.org/web/20210712025824/https://canarywat...


We would have known this sooner, if only somebody had built a warrant canary canary canary.


At that point, you pretty much have to write it in Java. :)


The feeds could also be delivered via rss.


I’m sure NetBSD will be ported soon enough, if not yet…


Nah, that’s for HTML


[video]?


hi labria, click on the title of the post to view the youtube video


they are simply saying the title should warn users that it is a video and don't click with your mic unmuted while in a meeting :)


oops my bad!


This is also a museum of 90s website design ;)


You say that like it is a bad thing!

It's lightweight, has the information I need with no spammy advertisements.... yet has a quirky, slightly fun design. Looks good to me!

EDIT: And best of all, it isn't optimised for a sodding 15 x 7 cm screen!


I worked on the Iridium website (via an agency I worked at) in 2001 -- it was quite the upgrade from their old site at the time, but still had the narrow, center aligned design of the 90's. Unfortunately that homepage remained their homepage for almost 6 years after that.


Meaning that it loads quickly, doesn't mess up scrolling or history, has no paywall or obnoxious popups etc etc... ?


It probably works well over low bandwidth satellite internet.


I just disable this filtering. It’s more damage than good nowadays…


Nowadays? Try day one. I always thought of this as a misfeature and disabled it from the start. I have no idea how this would be useful to me.


For me, it's been the single greatest boost to email productivity. It works great 99%+ of the time for me where I only keep any eye on Updates and Primary, and maybe once a week clear out the Promotions tab. Forums and Social I can usually clear out without even looking.

Interesting how people can have such different experiences.


I think it's the difference between people that unsubscribe from lists and those that don't.

If you're a regular unsubscriber, your email box is only ever filled with relevant important items.

I do the same thing with my phone notifications. If my phone ever gets a notification, it's something that directly concerns me.

I don't know how people live getting bombarded with stuff all day, but like you said, everyone's different.


Classical AI (i.e. manually-constructed email rules) is much better for this kind of thing, in my experience. You don't get spurious false positives; you can predict every false positive in your head before you even get the email, and if you want you can even add an extra rule to prevent it from happening in the first place!

“Unknown / trusted / spam senders” lists are a basic implementation of this concept.


This is why Inbox's Bundles feature was amazing. User-defined rules, emails either show up live or in digest form throughout the day, shown in your (one) inbox, not in some panel where secondary "labels" or "folders" are relegated to. Collapsed by default, but expandable.

Gmail thought that adding Snooze was enough to get feature parity and kill Inbox, but Bundles were by far the feature keeping me on Inbox.


I, for one, don't use that feature because I use two email addresses. People who know me personally only know one of them, and I use the other for registrations and subscriptions.


This has also had the greatest effect for me. If you don't share your main email with sketchy reselling parties, it remains surprising clean. And this on a 10 year old+ account.


sort of this: i treated the Promotions tab as a "unsubscribe from these mailing lists ASAP" tab as soon as the category feature came out

i get so few of them now i removed all those extra tabs and filters a year ago, but it was pretty useful to get my total inbox as clean as it is now :)


Right, exactly. I want my "promotions" to land square one in my inbox, because then I'm going to deal with them right then and there. Unsubscribe comes first. A filter comes next, if they keep sending.


Gmail has a “report spam and unsubscribe” button which I use liberally.


I feel guilty using it the first go. I figure I will click on their unsubscribe link first. And then I will click the report spam button if they continue to send me email

Unfortunately, all I'm probably doing is just confirming my email address to generate future "mailing list" subscriptions.


I get quite a bit of emails that are not completely spam, but by no means urgent to see. The filtering has been great to let me focus on things I need to see immediately, without having to scroll through 50 different promotional things


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: