>I think it’s important to discern that sodium citrate is part of the base of citric acid.
There are no sodium atoms in citric acid, and losing protons to form a conjugate base won't create them. The citric acid will have to react with sodium already present if you don't add some, which may not be in sufficient quantity to neutralize the acid. Sodium citrate is only one of many citric acid salts, and even that has three varieties, so I hardly think you can say it's "part of the base of citric acid", no?
I won’t respond to this pile-on of criticism as you wrote this in an attempt at humiliation. I did however respond to the similar duplicate comment from another user below. Hope that helps. Know that it was just a typo.
Ah ok, so the squabble is just whether the `keepassxc` package is the full or the limited version. That's no biggie but I can see how it's annoying when people raise issues upstream after downstream disabled features.
Worth noting that part of the reason the Arch wiki is more effective than the Debian wiki is that the former only deals with a single version of things, "current", whereas the Debian wiki has to address multiple releases. This makes it more difficult to prune old information or to have a concise narrative, among other effects.
reply