Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | kjhgbhjkl's comments login

I think that was the result of Dyson's study - a gunner never saw a fighter so they could just as effectively be removed or repalced with fixed guns.

And in Wald's research a night fighter still had some difficulty finding and approaching abomber even with ground radar - so they fired at it (using proximty fuses or upward firing guns) essentially at random points - there was no statsistical bias of the fighter pilot targetting specific systems


Children are a Ponzi scheme - you have lots of children to support you in old age (either directly in 3rd world or via social security in the 1st) This leads to over population - but screw them, you will be dead.

It's rather like some countries attitude to consuming natural resources, if we don't burn the oil first somebody else will


Generally there is a bounce. For a generation after women get the chance of a career, education etc the birth rate plumnets - this is the position Italy is in.

Then 20-30 years later those same women have reached positions in politics, industry, education etc where they can influence policy on childcare, maternity leave etc. Then the number of children goes back up - this is the state Scandanavia is in.

Germany is a little odd, remember that less than 20years ago it absorbed a 3rd world country which rather screws up it's stats.


Calling the DDR a 3rd world country is a little exaggerated in my opinion.


HN now with free hyperbole.


Hiring practices of course being totally irrelevant to the vast majority of HN readers


sarcasm? you really think the majority of HN users are startup founders?


No - but many of them have dreamed about getting jobs in vancouver


One thing I've learned from my brief time on HN is that HNers don't like humor. I couldn't read your original comment, but I voted this up because this was a funny response.


It's not that we don't like humor. Most people just aren't as funny as they think they are.


Haha, fair enough.


On the contrary, I love a good joke! I think the problem is sometimes its difficult to differentiate sarcasm, trolling, and idiocy without knowing the person or vocal cues.

The OP wrote the comment on a new account with absolutely no history to guide me. What should be my default take?


sorry - I create a new account each day. Too much traceable info online for the industry I work in.


No worries. I'm not too concerned about my karma, though -4 seems harsh for not catching a joke.


Sarcasm can be hard to interpret on the interwebs from strangers with no context. Clever response though!


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: