Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | jspash's commentslogin

Omit the key and store it in a single json column. The worst of all worlds!


If the json has a natural key, you can add a json index pointing to it, at least in postgres. But this will probably have worse performance characteristics than adding a separate key column.

Also natural keys suck - if a bugged json comes with repeated key (or no key at all) you will be unable to save it to process it further (well unless you have a separate table to save them). Also some jsons won't be keyed

But storing something with no index at all is probably okay if you don't plan to query much (or if the dataset is tiny)


You've never met my neighbours! No seriously. Some people are just jerks.


The domain and article just a long-form advert for the author's observability sass. Oddly it's free, but you have to sign up for Cloudlfare, where the author is currently employed.

It's seems they are playing the long-long game!

All snarkiness aside, I learned a few things from the article. And I might even sign up to the sass since I already have a CF account.


I have a tiny long-haired dog (the first dog I've ever had) and I'm glad our first trainer/behaviourist mentioned the dangers of foxtails to us. We casually asked the vet if it was a problem and she said they see around 2-3 animals a week with issues caused by foxtails during the late summer/early autumn months. This is in the Southern UK. It's been getting drier and drier every year. And subsequently more and more foxtails seem to be appearing.

The main issue we've found is she gets them stuck under her "armpits" and under the tail. Places that make them very difficult to find. Even more insidious is when they embed themselves in the harness, only to make an appearance weeks or months later when the outdoor foxtails have mostly been cut down.

The problem is that they can work their way under the skin with a barbed spike that is one-way only. So if they get deep enough the only remedy is to cut the skin with a scalpel - by the vet of course.


I would love to be able to toggle an attribute off/on to see what affect each has on the uniqueness of my fingerprint. My guess is that there are a handful of _very_ unique things, that if obscured, would make one less recognisable.


https://coveryourtracks.eff.org/ is less detailed but shows the individual uniqueness of each attribute.


that site has the same issue. It will give ridiculous and easily provably false results for iPhones.

There are ~40 million in the PST time-zone. Some percent have smartphones (80%+), ~50% of those are iPhones (16 million). Of those, the majority are set it English (80%+), and are divided into screen sizes. But basically, if you have an iPhone, you have the same fingerprint has at least a million other other people in the PST time size. You are at best, 1 of 100, not 1 of x,xxx,xxx,xxx.

You might be x,xxx,xxx,xxx of people who visited that unpopular site but no one needs tracking on an unpopular site. On a popular site you will not have a unique finger print.


I never quite understood this “tell”. I use the word all the time. As do a lot of the people I have know. Written and spoken.

Is this maybe an American thing? Ie it’s just not used much there?


"Delve" was one of the words whose usage spiked most dramatically after the launch of ChatGPT, relative to its usage pre-ChatGPT.


I used to wear a mask when I was sick but still had to be around people. It was just normal life. Then after COVID it became a political statement. Now if I did that people would assume I’m trying to say something.

I’ve always liked the American flag. I have a little pin on my jacket. People assume something by its presence.

That’s life. Delve is now an LLMism.


The problem is, I still get the wrong end of the stick when AWS or CF go down! Management doesn't care, understandably. They just want the money to keep coming in. It's hard to convince them that this is a pretty big problem. The only thing that will calm them down a bit is to tell them Twitter is also down. If that doesn't get them, I say ChatGPT is also down. Now NOBODY will get any work done! lol.


This is why you ALWAYS have a proposal ready. I literally had my ass saved by having tickets with reliability/redundancy work clearly laid out with comments by out of touch product/people managers deprioritizing the work after attempts to pull it off the backlog (in one infamous case for a notoriously poorly conceived and expensive failure of a project that haunted us again with lost opportunity cost).

The hilarious part of the whole story is that the same PMs and product managers were (and I cannot overemphasize this enough) absolutely militant orthodox agile practitioners with jira.


Every time a major cloud goes down, management tells us why don't we have a backup service that we can switch to. Then I tell them that a bunch of services worth a lot more than us are also down. Do you really want to spend the insane amount of resources to make sure our service stays up when the global internet is down?


Having an alt to Cloudflare isn’t preposterous.


Who decided to go with AWS of CF? If its a management decision tell them you need the resources to have a fallback if they want their system to be more reliable than AWS or CF.


Haha yeah I just got off the phone and I said, look, either this gets fixed soon or there's going to be news headlines with photographs of giant queues of people milling around in airports.


I have lastname.firstname@gmail.com because first.last was already taken.

Just curious, do gmail accounts ever expire? Will I ever get the chance to snag the other one? Or does it forever belong to my nemesis and life-long enemy?


Even if your google account is deleted, the email address is NOT recycled because it can be used to impersonate people - maybe the previous owner still has physical/digital accounts linked to that old email. As far as I know most services do this - an email address once registered is never released again.


Unused they have a half-life. Google Voice numbers much more aggressively so.

It's somewhere in the document.



This answer is not actually correct. I have an account I deleted 18 years ago, still can’t make it again.


Could in theory be because someone else grabbed the account 16 years ago tho, unless I'm missing something?


No Google does not allow creating a new account with a previously-used Gmail address. Each Gmail address can be used at most once.


I emailed the address to make sure: It bounce due to not existing.


You can never make another account with that address because Google does not delete things.


What really annoys me is the variance in corner radius now. Because some apps have released an upgrade and others haven't.


It's worse than that. The Apple apps have all the variance too. It's not about old apps. It's literally by design. It depends on things like whether they have a toolbar. It's bonkers.


+1 for using bonkers


Your link doesn't counter GP's comment in any way. The extra conotext is appreciated though.


Yes, it clearly does. The point of that comment depends on the supposition that Trump was praising objectionable groups, so as to liken DHH's behaviour to that. But it is well established that Trump did not, in fact, praise objectionable groups. And reading the full text of Trump's interview reveals nothing objectionable about what he was saying.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: