Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | jonplackett's commentslogin

The point is there are much better ways to enforce this - like just setting up proper parental controls on a device.

Kids can’t buy their own phone. So parents can always enforce stuff at a hardware level if they set it up properly. It would be much better to just mandate that phones set up with a kid profile cannot access social media.


The problem isn't an individual kids phone. It's their peers devices, or other ways they can explore the internet that isn't under their guardians control. This is a systemic issue that requires systemic approach. I am not making any claims about the qualities of currently discussed systemic solutions, but I do want to point out that the 'parents can just' argument is missing the mark.

Many parents don’t have the technical aptitude to set the controls up properly. I am a software engineer and I find it challenging to keep up with the nuances of parental control setup and how to adjust it as kids get older. Content is also imperfectly tagged and smart kids can easily find loopholes in most controls. Having a centralized ID validation system wouldn’t be an ideal solution but having something baked into the Internet itself to help parents shield their kids from inappropriate would be a good thing.

This is not how any other thing that is banned for children is enforced. It makes no sense.

The person selling the age gated item needs to take lawful measures to ensure they arent selling it to a minor. Their parents have nothing to do with it.

Your solution would be that if a 14 year old walks into a liquor store and doesnt have a note from their parents saying that they arent allowed to drink alcohol, then the store should be able to sell it to them.


You can just turn all this stuff off.

I’m curious what the account recovery flow is without the AI.

Is it this dumb?

Does it bypass 2fa?


So is your business model to expose AI security issues and then sell the solution?

Isn’t that what anyone does who is selling a solution to a problem that already exists?

Is that not every cyber consultancy? What's wrong with that?

What would be the alternative business model?

AI is creating jobs!

As apposed to spending it based on feels?

For people who buy a Ferrari the price is not part of the equation at all.

Also Ferrari’s whole game is demand and supply manipulation - there are always more people who want a Ferrari than can actually buy one. These will all sell out whatever happens.


I think all cars should have a ‘LUNCH’ button.

It can be sponsored by Uber Eats and whenever you press it, it automatically orders a burger to your current GPS co-ordinates.


Americans when describing their ideal car interior: "Imagine a burger ordering button".

It sounds like it should be in that car Homer Simpson designed, although I guess it would order doughnuts in this case

This doesn’t factor in the growth in the value of your house, which mostly happens tax free (in the uk at least)

We bought our house 10 years ago and it’s basically doubled in value since then. Which is way more than the money I’ve spent on interest.

It seems like this is also based on buying somewhere with a super low deposit, which I agree is probably a bad idea.


It’s good that they proved it I guess. But they could have just asked literally any person in history doing anything creative as a job.

Least surprising announcement of the decade goes to…

Are they buying these for the tech, the people or to prevent supply chain hacks?


Acquihire, with a side of shutting down a vendor that OpenAI prominently uses


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: