I came to this conclusion as well. The README gives off some vibes but the sheer volume and writing style of the code comments is what really sells it for me. For example:
// Enhanced styling with column-specific classes and alignment
This sort of marketing-speak isn't what people typically put in their code, LLMs love buzzwords. It's not just this, it's everything, but hopefully you get what I mean.
The mindless code comments are a dead giveaway. It's always the same pattern of:
"a thing" <--- here is a thing
Generally a dev would clean these up, but when they don't it's a major red flag to me that it's just unreviewed vibe coded slop.
No way in Hades would I upload a copy of sensitive personal documentation like a driver's license or a passport to the likes of Google, Facebook, Microsoft, Amazon, OpenAI, Antropic or even privacy-respecting Apple.
NASA is a space agency. S P A C E. It's in the name.
By wading into the climate debate, NASA exposed itself as a far-left target and is now paying the price. NASA can thank Gavin Schmidt for corrupting the science and turning it into a political agenda.
Mr. Gruber was certainly one of the inventors of Markdown but has rested on the laurels ever since. Remember that the late Aaron Schwartz was the co-inventor of Markdown. So let's not give Mr. Gruber too much attention for his opinions on how Markdown has evolved because he's chosen not to participate in its development or adoption.
Indeed, he is far more likely to let loose a tirade of anti-Trump sentiment, and in that regard he comes across as a terribly damaged individual. His opinions are many, and so we cannot give them too much weight.
reply