Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | more jaapbadlands's comments login

It takes more hubris to believe, as cosmic blips, that we have no responsibility to mitigate our outsized effect on the long-term direction on the ecology of the planet.


The point wasn't that you should use PHP, it was to not jump on stack trends. There is a name for your kind of fallacy.


If that system kills one innocent person, then it's not worth the dopamine hit that you're chasing in pursuit of "justice".


It’s not the chase of a dopamine hit. It’s the goodness and strength of a society that recognizes the power of properly ordered human sentiments.


Google will soon be adding this sort of stuff directly to their office tools anyway, just like Microsoft is.


What makes you say "isn't working"? VR and the Metaverse are long term bets, they're not meant to be working yet. Far too early to write off as failures.


Door-to-door transport is here to stay, despite any idealised vision of everyone moving to a train schedule.


Those might be considerations for you. For many others, they'll love their car out earning revenue when they don't need it, and plenty of people who want door-to-door clean transportation without having to wait at a bus stop and without having to own a car.


Non-conformity soon becomes conformity with a different haircut.


Every original image is copyrighted. You're suggesting making a digital copy of every image there is to check that AI isn't generating digital copies of every image there is.


Not a copy, a hash or fingerprint. Just enough data to measure if it's substantially similar.

But yes, it may be infeasible to index and compare against every image ever uploaded.


If I understand correctly, wouldn't a hash database of <just the training set> be larger than the actual model? (in fact by 1 or 2 orders of magnitude?)


Yeah, I guess so. The models are only 4 or 8 GB. A giant list of hashes would be bigger, sure. But they're 2 very different things. Model is for generating new images, this hash database is copyright enforcement. If you really want to check for violations I don't know how else you're going to do it.


Approximately, yes.


Couldn't I just add a few non-sense bytes into my images to change the hash/fingerprint?


Hash yes, fingerprint maybe no. Maybe I'm using the term incorrectly here, but I think of fingerprint like a lossy hash. Like one way of doing this would be to resize the image to, say, 8 by 8, and quantize it to say, 16 colors. So the fingerprint size is 884 bits=32 bytes. Tiny changes aren't likely to change the fingerprint. You'd probably have to do something a little more clever so as not to get too many false positives though. Or once you get a hit, do a deeper comparison.


I'm both scared and peeking through my fingers at the thought of the evolution of vocal-tuning plugins like Melodyne. Currently you can basically draw the pitch of a vocal performance, however using AI you could re-render the wavefile and adjust more parameters than simply pitch - such as timbre, inflection, vibrato, dynamics, distortion, openness, softness, breathiness, or a bunch of other vocal attributes.


Voice synthesizer plugins, such as Vokaloid or Synthesizer V, can already do that quite convincingly, so it is only a matter of time before it can be applied to existing voice recordings.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: