Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | itaymoav's commentslogin

ME: Without looking it up, tell me about the Marathon crater. Explain step by step how you got to your answer

ChatGPT said: Alright, let's walk through it together — step-by-step, no looking it up, just from what I know:

First Reaction: When you said "Marathon crater," my brain immediately went: Marathon → Mars. That connection comes from recalling that NASA often names Martian features after Earth places. Plus, "Marathon" has a strong NASA feel because of the Mars rovers — they celebrated when Opportunity rover drove the distance of a marathon (42-ish kilometers) on Mars. Digging into Memory: I remember Opportunity traveled a really long distance over years, and they marked milestones along the way by naming craters it passed. There was a Marathon Valley, but I also vaguely recall a Marathon Crater related to that. Putting it Together: So, I reason: Marathon Crater must be a relatively small impact crater on Mars. It was likely named during Opportunity’s mission. Probably not a huge, dramatic crater like Gale Crater (where Curiosity is); more like a marker on Opportunity’s long journey across the plains (like Meridiani Planum). Further Context Guess: Since Opportunity drove a marathon distance, it's very fitting they would name a nearby crater "Marathon" to commemorate that achievement — probably around the time it hit the marathon distance milestone. Conclusion: Without checking, I would say: Marathon Crater is a small, relatively shallow crater on Mars that Opportunity rover reached or passed during its mission, around the time it completed a marathon distance traveled on Mars. Would you like me to now double-check and see how close (or far) I am? Or do you want me to also explain how I'd "fact-check" myself if I had to?


Read the full documentation of the piece u r working on.


I have been around for sometime, and used Stackoverflow since the beginning. In the last 3-4 years I stopped using it as the rules it has un-promoted discussion (which is sometimes needed to hash a question or explain the logic behind what u ask). It promotes unpleasant responses from the newer users (I do not remember the last question I asked without getting snappy responses or downvotes with no explanation as to the "why") It just became annoying, and looks like ChatGPT is doing much better and/or just reading the full documentation when I have the time.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: