Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | innagadadavida's comments login

Empirically a monkey did already creat the works of Shakespeare in a mere 13billion years. This is the time it took for the universe to form, earth to evolve to create a monkey that could write all those words down. The entire process from start to finish is way more complicated and random than anyone typing 26 character randomly into the keyboard. But I guess we are talking about uniform distributions here.


This sequence replaces an infinite God with ~infinite time and then draws the wrong conclusion.


You're replacing a hypothetical situation meant to illustrustrate mathematics with something else. The monkeys don't eat, evolve, age, conspire, have agendas or agency, they type randomly as a means to invoke visual imagery of a monkey slamming it's hands down ignorantly on a typewriter. It's chaotic slamming is the "input" that gets eventually distributed in different ways, one of which, if given enough time, will be identical to shakespeare.

Assuming implications to theology or genetic sequencing where none were given is a reflection of your ability to handle rational discussion of the material.


This sub-thread moved on from the original hypothesis as soon as innagadadavida put forward his non-empirical empirical example. Take it up with him, he may also enjoy your evaluation of his rationality.


I hope Zuckerberg is not funneling this into some sort of secret slush fund that will blow up like Enron.


I’m skeptical that the entities that created this problem - first world countries, industries, politicians all supported by scientific advances can/will solve the problem they created.

The industry will look for a profit motive to solve this. The scientists will look for a publication and fame motive. The politicians will try to grab more power. The poor animals and other third world country people who had nothing to do with this will bear the brunt. Only time will tell.


Not changing anything will be the most boring option. But yeah, if you are a BSD expert/fan, maintaining it is more boring than Linux.


If this trend continues, science will be more like religion


It has been. Look at the history of science. Or look at well-educated lazy people. They explicitly say they believe in science.


The only hole in this theory is that solar currently doesn’t help with car and automobile usage.


If I drive to my office and use their solar charger to charge my EV (which conveniently comes from China) while it's there, or if I'm lucky enough to have a wfh job and then charge it during the day while I'm working, why wouldn't it?

Though the other thing to note is that Texas and thus the US is now a net exporter of oil, the opposite of the 70' oil crisis.

Regardless of their intentions, energy independence is a huge thing for a country's sovereignty.


Google.

The perverse ad incentives is what broke it.


It used to be nearly impossible to game Google for search engine results and for some reason over the last 8-10 years, its become comical how easy it is to game them for good search results now.


That is because Google realized that there is an optimal compromise between "good search" and "more ad revenue", and that "optimal" is quite far away from "good search". Better than no search, but not by much. In fact, in between searching Wikipeda and simply memorizing/bookmarking the best websites for niche topics, I have stopped using search because the results on the first page are absolutely useless.


Social media also killed web 1.0 community, but, yes mostly google.


More than the money, they were able to attract top talent and avoid regulations and senate hearings by calling themselves OpenAI. Genius move even by scamster standards.


When accused of copyright infringement, they could also say, "But we are a non-profit, we are just advancing the progress of science!"


It's not like a for-profit cannot do scientific research.


Yes, but...

> The fair use statute itself indicates that nonprofit educational purposes are generally favored over commercial uses.

[0] https://copyright.columbia.edu/basics/fair-use.html


Part of move fast / break things culture. It also doesn’t help that Zuckerberg is trying hard to nit tightly integrate with native stack.


Oh wow, this is insanely good. Are there any model details?


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: