Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | incontrol's comments login

If your location is set to EU, you are not auto-opted in.


Correct. So not ‘everyone’ is opted in by default. Just the people without privacy laws…


When I feel the need to add a comment, I convert that piece of content into the named function.


So how do you document what is not in the code?


Obviously in the function name!

    void vendorReturnsDataInInvalidFormatAndButShouldBeResolvedByVendorOpenTicketXYZ_123ExpectedResolutionQ42024(String input) {}

/s


I asked who the killer was, and I got the name. Case solved.


Why do you keep mediocre programmers at the office?


Once upon a time...

...an engineer self-hosted stuff on his iMac.

Months have gone by...

...before LinkedIn realized their lost millions of user data records.


Funny enough on my machine, Chrome is the slowest on https://browserbench.org/Speedometer2.1/

401 - Chrome

446 - Firefox

546 - Safari


357 - Chrome with extensions

511 - Chrome without any extensions

433 - Clean firefox install

500 - Clean edge install

On an AMD Ryzen 7950X3D / 5600MHz RAM

Interestingly, I got substantially different results depending on whether I used chrome with my typical extensions or not. Looking at the flamegraph, I don't seem to see the full picture of why there's such a substantial difference. Bitwarden/React Developer tools (the 2 primary extensions I use) don't seem to make enough of an impact to account for the roughly 40% performance increase seen without them. The browserbench javascript accounted for ~38.6% of the overall time taken for the benchmark, but the sum of my extensions was only 6.5%. I'm not incredibly familiar with browser performance profiling, so there's probably more to the story.


I'm getting

  457 - Chrome
  444 - Safari
  348 - Firefox
M1 Mac


Probably subjective to your particular set up - I just got the opposite results on my mac:

202 ± 4.7 - Chrome

184 ± 5.0 - Firefox

171 ± 2.6 - Safari


fyi, if you're uncertain in the single-digits place, you have no precision in the tenths place. for experimental uncertainty, it's always one sigfig


Neat site but it almost needs a flash/epilepsy warning =P


Isn't that pretty much irrelevant? Won't network speed etc make much more of a difference?


Consider applying for YC's W25 batch! Applications are open till Nov 12.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: