I was looking for a way to get a user prompt within wez and came across this page which has an example for what you asked for "Example of interactively renaming the current tab".
That looks super interesting, congratulations. I would suggest you do write lots of documentation, a more elaborate readme on github and generally push your approach. As it stands, the repo looks somewhat unfinished and inactive, unlikely to make people spend their time and energy digging into it. I hope you drive it forward!
You are totally right, but I'm not actively working on it, because core (the base library) is basically ready and I'm working on a project in production which is exclusively using it [1]. The site is using htmx, feels snappy overall and I'm even generating static parts with it (e.g. the home page).
I often want to know who there is a sudden growth disk usage over the last month/week/etc, what suddenly take space. In those cases I find myself wishing that du and friends would cache their last few runs and would offer a diff against them, this easily listing the new disk eating files or directories. Could dut evolve to do something like that?
Almost all of them will have some difference. What is needed is to parse the previous state, calculate the difference in size, and show only the "significant" difference.
btdu extra (or expert?) mode with snapshots kinda does that: you can see what's only in the new version and not in a snapshot; and vice-versa.
Also it offers attributing size to folders only for extends that aren't shared with a different folder (snapshots are essentially just special folders), to kinda get a diff between the two (stuff only present in the old snapshot is shown there; stuff only present in the new version is shown there).
I wrote a cross platform outliner 20 years ago that I have been using almost everyday since. I have more than 60'000 headers in there, with my notes about everything.
Right now I'm building a flutter/kotlin meditation timer for myself.
The minimal semantic parts of words are morphemes. Syllables are phonological units (roughly: the minimal unit for rhythmic purposes such as stress, etc)
Only in languages that have morphemes! This is hardly a universal attribute of language so much as an attribute of those that use an alphabet to encode sounds. It makes more sense to just bypass the encoding and directly consider the speech.
Besides, considering morphemes as semantic often results in a completely different meaning than we actually intend. We aren't trying to train a chatbot to speak in prefixes and suffixes, we're trying to train a chatbot to speak in natural language, even if it is encoded to latin script before output.
That's technically wrong. Every language has morphemes for the simple reason that every word is at least one morpheme. `cat` is a morpheme. `cats` is two morphemes (cat-s).
(The point about semantics is also technically wrong. You would first need to specify your view of semantic compositionality before such a point can be evaluated, but the usual views of semantics don't have any such consequence.)
> Every language has morphemes for the simple reason that every word is at least one morpheme.
Sure, if you define "morpheme" as a collection of syllables that's meaningful to people using alphabetic script. I don't see any benefit to this compared to working with syllables directly, which is a meaningful concept regardless of the script used to encode them.
> Sure, if you define “morpheme” as a collection of syllables
Cats, as noted, has two morphemes, despite having only one syllable. Syllables and morphemes are largely orthogonal, morphemes can be less than, equal to, or more than a syllable (and even when more than, may or may not start or end on a syllable boundary.)
(Also, syllables aren’t the minimal semantic units even of spoken speech, those are phonemes – a syllable consists of at least one phoneme, potentially more. But morphemes, even an alphabetic script if it isn’t perfectly phonetic, still don’t necessarily map to one or more phonemes, since is textual semantic unit may have no effect on pronunciation.)
Beautifully said! However, in my experience, finding your own virtue requires interacting with others, and adjusting our view depending on how it went. Ie it takes both the grouping with others, and the inner quest.
And once you're grouped with others, why not interact also group to group, rather than just individual to individual, and profit from both higher order learning and influencing the world -- which I think is similar to what you describe as "power seeking aspects".
That said, the piece about finding "like-minded individuals" remains elusive, if one is serious about pursuing one's own values and way of being in the world.
Freeware versus open source is a good point. But freeware typically can't be modified by the recipient, whereas downloadable models and open source code can. So I think there's still a need for a different term, neither open source nor freeware...
I would argue that the kind of modification you can do to a big blob of weights is more akin to fiddling with a binary in a hex editor than modifying source code. It is not the "preferred form" for the source, and you cannot cleanly and easily do things like modify its "alignment" - that is why people speak of "jailbreaking" these models. So I still think "freeware" works as a term.
You also need to change the boot behavior of sshd to wait for wireguard (tailscale in my case) to be available. I had to add a couple of lines to the ssh systemd unit.
Yep. And also pay attention during package and system upgrades on some systems. In certain cases it messes up this ordering, and you end up with sshd starting before Wireguard again and then sshd doesn’t find any interface with the specified address, which in turn makes it so that it won’t bind to that address. Making the machine unreachable until you manually fix it again.
A less finnicky approach would be binding to 0.0.0.0, then configuring incoming firewall policy. By default deny, then allow SSH through wireguard network. Or by default allow then deny SSH through public network.
if you want to get fancy and/or over engineered you would use systemd templated units to setup sshd@.service and a ListenAddress in the config listening on %i. Then you could bring up sshd@(expectedip).service for each expected IP
.. but that doesn't gain all that much tbh.if anything the only hesitation I'd have on listening to * and relying on firewall rules is if the service comes up before its configured. but exposing sshd isn't even that bad
I did something like that but somehow after an upgrade I still lost access to one of my systems that I had set up like that. This machine is physically in a different city from me so I rarely have the chance to go there. And lately I’ve even been in another country.
it only takes 3 lines in a systemd override fille (which I think don't suffer the overwrite-on-upgrade problem). To my mind, that keeps the startup logic nicely local in service files.
This looks great - how do you then keep the subset that you want to continue listening to in the longer term? Is there an "extract to my music collection" feature - or is this your music repository?
