Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | more inatreecrown2's comments login

Please add a column whether it is an actual recording of a human voice or AI generated.


There needs to be a column for the name of the narrator. I will listen to almost anything read by a narrator that I like. The LibriVox version of Flatland has long, detailed descriptions of the illustrations, but I've still listened to it several times because the narrator has a great accent.

She's Ruth Golding btw. https://librivox.org/reader/2607?primary_key=2607&search_cat...


That is a good idea. Thanks for the link to Ruth Golding, great voice!


That's a good idea, it would likely help filter my voice preference. Some of the audio recording are more difficult to listen to than others.


The lit2go and librivox audio sources should all be human. The project Gutenberg are all AI generated.


it is well done. grateful for sharing your work.


Thank you, and I’m glad you appreciate it!


You'll never be the same again regardless. Food for thought.


yes, it looks very uncomfortable.


They do have a spiky edition tho, too, so maybe that's something


it must be recorded, otherwise it will seem like magic


Looking at this it is absolutely amazing and almost incomprehensible how far technology has advanced in the years since then.


I think the biggest "shock" is how quickly these things got normalised, but this is in part down to how we used to see this stuff; back in the 90's I first saw stuff on TV about video calls and computers and the like (but turns out that was decades after that kinda thing was first presented and probably a hundred years since it was used in sci-fi), but the way it's presented is all in marketing fashions, like, very intentionally sitting at a desk, dialing a number for a very formal conversation.

"real" video calling sort of snuck in through the back doors once people got webcams and MSN / Skype, and became mainstream / common in the 2000's with always-on internet, remote work, etc. And at one point the smartphone and mobile internet got in people's hands and (video) calls became casual.

I think the other part there is that it's normal people using them. What I mean by that is that in these videos, it's all very formal corporate people. And then the first people that really get interested in this kind of technology or who have an interest in futuristic stuff are / were the "nerdy" types. (I am probably living in a bubble though). But it was the average joe that normalised this technology.


tl;dr when normal people start using things, it becomes noramlised!


This was not even "the technology" of then.

This was what engineers were barely capable of, with the technology that did exist, but even most executives who were the type of user it was envisioned for never knew anything about it, much less had anything like this much desktop technology ever.

Everybody else in the non-executive category, even more of a complete fantasy.

IOW the difference between what you see there vs now is minor, compared to the real "backward" state back then.

Even though things like transistor radios were already common, you have to realize that in a huge percentage of dwellings in the US, and way more in the rest of the world, there was still not yet a single transistorized product.

I was a young math & electronics geek and was aware of more stuff like this than average.

Along with all the much more mature people, like the extremely rare engineering students who might want to work for IBM or something, this was exactly the kind of thing that was inspiring the movie "2001: A Space Odyssey" which came out the next year.

Anyone who had any clue something like this was already possible, could basically agree how cool it would be and was really looking forward to the 21st century when it would be here.

If the world was not destroyed by nuclear war before the 21st century got here :\


this is great! I hope it doesn't repeat every 24hours though


It seems to have a few different phrases for each minute between which it chooses randomly.


I think it's just sad to see someone that was (or is still?) a fanatic about everything Apple become or show himself a political fanatic.


In what way is he being a "political fanatic" in this post? His writing has never been politically neutral - nor has he ever claimed it was - but this post calling out the lameness of a bunch of tech CEOs posting similar ass-covering congratulations to the winner of the presidential election - especially the ones who clearly would have preferred a different winner - could have been written by anyone.


he loves to hate on trump, better?


for a more patchable experience check out the projects from slightlynasty.com


what I find interesting in her short films is the "disconnect" between visual and audio. it is not perfectly synchronized, perhaps it would not have been possible to do so. but today with all out technical possibilities, to see something like this, it transmits a kind of purity and innocence.


Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: