I dont think chatbots like ChatGPT are productive for students at large. There is def an argument for high-performing students who understand how to use chatGPT productively but more importantly low-performing students struggle to get the most out of chatGPT due to bandwidth issues in the classroom. When I talk to teachers about AI in the classroom they prefer their students to stay as far away from chatGPT as they can because building a strong educational foundation with long lasting learning skills should come before using tools like ChatGPT. Once that foundation is there, generative AI tools are way more useful. In the classroom AI should be teacher facing, and not centralize around students and quick answers.
As someone who loves to cook I really like this idea, I think it would be really helpful if there was some kind of social element -- like seeing how many people cooked a meal, or reviews from others not just from your immediate family circle. I always wanna know what other people think about dishes prior to cooking, NYT cookbook does this really well with their comment section (which I always check before cooking)
We have plans to put o1 on the leaderboard - but Opus is there RN! We should have a new ELO ranking soon, but the second o1 ranking are done it will be on our leaderboard.
We found that there is more nuance when it comes to different languages, we also update our leaderboard as new models drop so the best models are always available through PreCog. It's also nice to not have to tab switch constantly between chatbots and instead just use them in one central place. We added a feature so you can just pick the model you'd like to chat with if you dont want to be automatically matched with the leaderboard rankings (all matched responses provide an explanation in the reasoning behind the match so you can see why the model was chosen).
Just took down the sign up for anyone who wants try it out! Thanks again for pointing that out - new to posting on here, super helpful hope you get some use out of our project.
That doesn't really change the fact that it's exhausting (and worse, "commercially offputting") to be reminded that we're careening towards the worst futures literally imagined. I stayed away from Soylent and I'll probably stay away from this, but thanks for the head's up. rimshot
As big PKD fans, that definitely flew over our heads a bit. Can def understand that view and understand why its is commercially exhausting especially because we agree that we are heading toward some of the worst futures possible, so did PKD. We definitely build with this in mind!
we have looked at route llm and played with it but we felt like they were focusing on cost minimization, we think theres more work to be done in focusing on routing for the best possible output without the cost constraint. Also just trying to provide easy ways for people to use tools like route llm that dont require coding knowledge. That being said we def wanna release a benchmark of our routing in comparison to some of the pre-trained defaults in route llm
