Put a servo on the door and a camera on the front. Train a vision model to recognize when your eyes are looking at the door and automatically open it for you.
Another camera inside will detect when you are done and close it.
I'd agree. but also that's too scary. and the bottleneck is the massive manual change control process since there's no automation around any of this. :)
Why take risk when you can spend money and take no risk
No, because the indices are free-float weighted not cap weighted. The float planned for SpaceX is tiny. If it were purchased by the indices at 1.7T on Monday and went to zero on Tuesday, the amount of value lost by the funds would be barely larger than the normal daily fluctuation of the market.
Sounds to me like you are advocating the decimation of the technology sector and a global recession that could last the better part of a decade, buddy!
People are born with different levels of aptitude, motor skill, and learning rate. Some people also work very hard at their studies. For the people who reach the top levels in instrumental performance, you find invariably that they were both born with a high aptitude and spent a great amount of time and energy to get there.
The most plausible explanation, based on the facts so far provided, is that it is Harigai, and he is not happy with how the game/company turned out and does not want to be reminded about it anymore.
The fact is that, if there were only one AGI that were ever to be created, then yes it would be quite unlikely for that to happen. Instead, what we are seeing now is you get an agent, you get an agent, etc. Oprah style. Now just imagine that a single one of those agents winds up evil - you remember that an OpenAI worker did that by accident from leaving out a minus sign, right? If it's a superintelligence, and it becomes evil due to a whoopsie, then human extinction is now very likely.
Another camera inside will detect when you are done and close it.
reply