Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | heptat's commentslogin

Didn't notice any bugs, but haven't tested for bugs. Used it and it works great - favicon.ico is much small than that other thing I used in http://nashape.com/blog/2012/09/12/big-favicons/. Great work! (especially because you did it in PHP which, after 10 years, I don't think I can face again...)


Good pick up, fixed that error now. Thanks for the link too!



This site is about IE8. This one is about IE9 on Win7: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ie/gg491740%28v=vs.8...

The optimal sizes are the same as the author's but 24x24 px. is missing in the recommended size list.

The site links to a blog entry about Pinned Sites in Win8. You can re-use the 144x144 px. PNG for a pinned site.


Out of interest, what language will you write it in?


Sorry about that – the point of the article definitely wasn't to exclude non-Retina users, it was just to document what I was encountering when I came to creating a favicon for the site.


As if "the retina age" were an actual thing. How many people have them now?


You don't think screen resolutions will continue to increase? I give it a couple of years, maybe less, before the "retina" resolution is standard hardware.


I don't want to think what beastly GPU I will have to buy to run next crisis on native resolution on ~150 dpi 21" monitor.


That's most likely going to be a >200dpi screen, where you can simply use 2x upscaling for better performance (with no visual degradation compared to current monitors).


That was my submission, not the author's words.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: