As a creative writer, "plot" and "story" have always eluded me. There's something mechanical—pushing, pulling—I just can't seem to construct, but I know when it's missing in books.
Some may. If it allows you to skip learning how to navigate a complex web app because the AI experience will help navigate for you, you may be drawn to it.
> Is this the index action of the widgets resource or the show action of the widget-list resource? is a question you will never have to ask yourself or your team. The widgets page is called WidgetsPage and available at /widgets.
Hm, uh, seems like now we will be forever asking ourselves this question about /widgets.
That being said, it looks good! Might get me back into ruby if I can come up with a project for it.
You can use a static analysis tool to check Ruby types ahead of time (still not a compiler) or provide information for tooling.
Alternatively you use them at runtime to check the correctness of data, which I don't think you can usually do with say Typescript where the typing information is for the most part compiled away[1].
1. I may be out of date on this but when I last looked at runtimes that could take Typescript directly they just threw the typing away. You just didn't need to use the tsc compiler first.
Me too! I kind of wish I didn't know it was shutting down, and they just replaced the button with something that saves it to /dev/null without ever telling me.
> a common psychological phenomenon whereby individuals give high accuracy ratings to descriptions of their personality that supposedly are tailored specifically to them, yet which are in fact vague and general enough to apply to a broad range of people. [0]
"Field" is a less mysterious term because it's not polysemous with a supernatural being (ghost) or a distilled alcoholic beverage (soluble liquid).
Sure, it's polysemous with "a cultivated expanse of land", but AFAIK there is no popular, problematic pseudoscientific quackery about suggesting our bodies possess rows of oats.
> Wenn wir das Wesen des Baumes suchen, müssen wir gewahr
werden, daß jenes, was jeden Baum als Baum durch waltet, nicht
selber ein Baum ist, der sich zwischen den übrigen Bäumen antreffen läßt.
reply