Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | fyleo's commentslogin

Current targets also include government agencies, other financial infrastructure (e.g., ATM networks), Crypto exchanges with spikes in Ruble inflow, certain TV stations and few companies.

Targets in Belarus are mainly media companies.


No it is down also for domestic IPs


It‘s a targeted DDOS coordinated by the „IT Army of Ukraine“

//Edit: Other current targets include Sberbank


Somewhat curiously, I'm getting "507 Insufficient Storage".


Logs after DDoS attacks can do that.


Pretty honest web server. Many give you a 500 for anything these days.


Probably safer, avoids leaking any kind of information from the website. Ideally they would have a neat error page on a CDN that shows up if the origin server cannot be reached though.


The entity in question does not have the best reputation.


"The risk of data abuse by commercial providers would undermine the effort to make digitalisation more democratic, they say."

It's as though citizens have no understanding of how contracts, oversight and regulations work.

If the government requires certain parameters to be kept, they will be.

The notion that these ID providers are going to 'abuse the data' is conspiratorially absurd to the extent that basic information control is written into the process.

If the financial incentives for 'abuse' don't exist, then really it's a matter of operational capability and pragmatism, in which case, private sector is an ok choice, just as it is for so many other things.

The government could feasibly do it, but there's no reason it can't be outsourced.

It's a bit short-sighted.


I met Craig last year in person and spent some time reading his book. No way he is Satoshi; he refused to give straight answers to rather simple questions and spent the whole time making rather obvious allegations. From all the dodgy people I met in crypto over the last years, if I ever met someone where just everything screams “conman” then it was Craig. I might be wrong, who knows. But I’d be willing to make a huge bet against him.


@fyleo Time will tell, Satoshi's identity can not remain secret forever.


Sure it can. His use of remailers makes me think he used full disk encryption. His sudden disappearance makes me think he unexpectedly died (e.g. in a traffic accident), and his family probably did not know his passphrase. All evidence of this person's work on Bitcoin was probably unintentionally destroyed in that scenario, and the people who destroyed it have no idea what their loved one was up to before his death (and will never mention it, for lack of knowledge).


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: