Why Zuckerberg is any better than the jeevacation?
Both cases makes teens as victims, both cases was a great deal for them but only from the first look. Both cases are piramid-like schemes when the victims attract new victims to keep benefitting from the system. Is it just like in alcohol case, when having too many victims justifies a bad spirit as the new norm?
He's arguably even worse if we consider just how much harm social media has done to teens and kids, but I'm sure the Meta folk here would prefer to believe that that's not the case. "Just following orders", right?
I think 100% wealth tax for billionaires is too kind, they are definitely experts in hiding their money. I would suppose 101-110% for them which makes things much more fair then letting them to have those funds which they have stolen earlier, before setting the 100% tax. And wait a minute, there will be no any single islang on Earth having less than 100% wealth tax.
I think banning this topic is leftist af. Why not to discuss as is? In previous topic which is no longer alive I supposed some anarcho-capitalist entusiasts behind this project because no else can even think in such direction. Maybe they will be kind to drop their 2 cents.
reply