I love TUIs and spent some time exploring the project. I guess you posted it here to hear some feedback.
The landing page compares it to xtermjs as superior version. What I find strange, for example, FrankenTUI has a code explorer tab, but it's impossible to select any text or interact with a scrollbar. The "hotspots" section in the codeview misinterprets mouse clicks, highlighting line that is different from a click.
If it meant to be keyboard-first, I find focus management implementation unintuitive and shortcuts hard to discover.
I find this to be a bizarre sentiment. It’s an artifact that exists. The chances of me making this by hand are 0. This would be a full time job for 3 years to research and build this. For 10 people. And it would have to charge a ton of money to access in that case.
I really think git worktrees are a bad approach. You’re better off in my view with one shared state and dealing with conflicts live by dividing tasks ahead of time using beads and letting agents communicate with each other using Agent Mail and file reservations.
I’ve been able to productively run 12+ agents from CC, Codex, Gemini-cli at the same time this way and it works really well.
I can't believe you're accusing someone of plagiarism because they had a similar idea that "claude code would be safer if it couldn't do destructive git calls". They also added much more protection, implemented it as a plugin, wrote thorough docs and have shipped many updates since.
You really think that's the same as someone blatantly plagiarizing the work and passing it off as their own? Give me a break. This is dishonest and odious.
I had a striking realization recently that has helped me improve my project. What matters isn’t what I think, it’s what the users which actually use the system think. Which is sort of obvious but somehow less so when the users are AI agents…
If the tool sucked, they would not be saying that. I’ve tried. Also they did give some negative feedback and it has already been used to improve the system.
