Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | duxup's comments login

I’m on there sometimes, haven’t seen any…


>Dissent also noted that the text of the court order does not specifically name DataBreaches.net nor reference the specific articles in question.

What did the court order even say?

The law firm managed to get a non specific order and the firm misrepresented it?


Cancel culture, but not even for something that the individual did… for the assumed actions of their a school they went to.


This seems like a poor choice.

People voting aren’t and won’t be considering the rules.

Maybe they should but that’s not how it works.


That's exactly the attitude they're trying to engineer by providing a new feedback mechanism.

Receiving warnings will help users who mean to be positive participants understand when their votes might have had a different effect, and will provide citable evidence for users who are being stubbornly negative/anti-community.

There's are fair critiques to be made about on how this might supress freedom of expression or how it anxious people who will panic on receipt of a warning, but it otherwise sounds like a practical idea for what it intends to acheive.


I don’t think this discourages anyone who wants to upvote that kind of thing.

I think it they misunderstand how people vote.


It will modify the behaviour of some of the people who vote.

Which is the point.

The interesting part is whether they can group out users who are more predisposed to upvote violence, develop a measure of tendancy, and observe a change for some subgroup.

If the admin want to downplay violent content they have a range of options, eg: if they have suitable measures then those who do not modify behaviour can have their upvotes diluted or negated on violent content or any other actions up to shadowbanning or beyond(?).

Reddit literally has a decade+ database on how people vote.


I honestly don’t think it will. People vote on instinct, they aren’t thinking of the rules, they won’t.

This is a hall monitor type solution where the only thing they can think of is to give the hall monitor permission to use the stick more.


Imagine a thousand people that upvote a specific bit of imagery that all get warnings.

Are you saying that they are all sheep that act in unison and not a single one would react differently to another?

How does that notion compare to, say, results from marketing tests on groups that trial various strategies and look at the spectrum of reactions in order to tune a campaign going forward?


   In addition, while this is currently “warn only,” we will consider adding additional actions down the road.
The back end can exert all manner of downward pressure on accounts that routinely upvote violence .. textual warnings are just the tip.

Countries shouldn’t gamble with taxpayer dollars.

Return it to taxpayers or invest in the country and so on.


"Taxpayer dollars" will continue on their course to worthlessness unless the US starts investing bitcoin which is a once-in-a-species invention that many people (especially on this site) fail to appreciate and understand.

https://www.onceinaspecies.com/p/bitcoins-full-potential-val...


it is not gambling, it is crypto - the best investment money can buy /s

It will be interesting if someone has to take the fall, cabinet member or Elon for the choices made.

We’ve already had some strange “I don’t know” answers from Trump officials in court, and judges already skeptical of the advisor claims.


>It is unclear whether the new guidance will result in laid off workers getting rehired.

So uh ... who fired all those people?

Does anyone get to rehire them?

Those folks still got a bunch of weird emails from this guy ...

I thought they already made the legal argument that Elon was just an advisor?

Who is running the show?


You will see...in one month he will say he hardly knew what Elon was doing, and anyway he was just an adviser...

Yay....? Inflation is still inflation.

>Economists and market participants worry that the Trump tariffs will raise prices and slow growth. However, White House officials point out that tariffs did little to stoke inflation during Trump’s first term

Because first term he threw out some token tariffs and then said something about it not being easy and he did nothing after that. This is different.


I partially agree with catlover76. This time around, so far it's also performative and not much action. So far. We'll see.

I guess that’s still a higher rate than 0% that they offer on other models.

Not other 3/4 or 1 ton pickups

If you're an athlete they want to ask about your genitals when entering the country, inspect your social media posts in other situations.

GoP in the US always complains about "big government" unless they get it use it ...


Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: