This is not a useful, constructive or meaningful statement.
Attempting to claim the models are the future by perpetually arguing their limitations are because people are using the models wrong or that the argument has been invalidated because the new model fixes it might as well be part of the training data since Claude Opus 3.5.
No no, I didn't say that at all. I'm just saying that the studies are irrelevant since models got a boost in their competence. I'm not in a fight pro or against llm's, I know how they work and their limitations. But the complexity of the problems they solve increased since opus 4.5 . If you can't admit that, it's your problem.
Also, I'm not blaming users for their shortcomings. I'm just saying they are not perfect but you can get different outcomes according to how you use them.
> Also, I'm not blaming users for their shortcomings. I'm just saying they are not perfect but you can get different outcomes according to how you use them.
I don’t question your sincerity. The problem is these arguments and framing are the same ones used by AI hucksters because it’s trivial to move the goalposts. They pull the same tricks as an MLM: success is just around the corner, forever.
IMHO, there’s a chasm between how to actually use these models and what they are being sold as.
Until some days / weeks ago, LLM's for coding was more hype than actually real code producing. That is gone now. They clearly leveled up, things will not be the same anymore. And of course this is not just for coding, this is just the beginning. A month ago it really seemed that the models were hitting a complexity wall and that the architecture would need to be improved. Not anymore.
It's different this time. You can see that at the same time, they are finally, definitely solving hard mathematical problems. They passed the phase of just being like good search engines to being actual generators of new data from their generalizations. I can give you a simple example. Any code they generated before brought frustration and they would loop with feedback. Now they actually produce "human level" code.
It should be possible in theory, as long as both use the same communication interface. In practice, I think getting it to work on just one kernel is already a huge amount of work.
United Nations agencies like UNRWA? As for the killing reports, it seems that Israel always kills civilians and particularly kids, they seem to like to spend their money in bombs directed at them because I never see reports of combatants being killed.
Individual combatants are rarely noteworthy enough to receive news attention. You do hear news articles when some higher-up is killed.
The deaths of children are more newsworthy, in themselves. You rarely hear their names, just the fact that it happened, because they are not otherwise notable as individuals.
Israel accuses the combatants of hiding among civilians, using them as human shields. If true, it would make the deaths of civilians inevitable. That is why hiding among non-combatants is a war crime.
You never see reports of ANY kind of military activity in Gaza. Even the blatantly obvious, the constant rocket launches, just never got reported. None of it.
And the Hezbollah situation is the same. Constant attacks by Hezbollah on Israeli civilians ... no mention anywhere.
It's not a videogame, it's a fast minecraft screenshot simulator where the prompt between each frame is the state of the input and the previous frames, with something of a resemblance of coherence.
reply