So many replies about doing the religion group thing, and op saying “great psychiatrist put me on bunch of antidepressants”, obviously this is U.S. centric. And optimistic in this way. I don’t see anyone not from U.S. replying and maybe it’s irrelevant, but think about it - maybe this is the end and you just counting the days until the end and nothing is coming, you will not meet anybody.
As if they are not allowed to make mistakes. If you watched more recent interviews, they understand that it was not cool on their part. Musically once per album they still have some interesting and somewhat innovative tracks still.
It seems like with time hallucinations and lying increased, it’s very different now from what it was 2 years ago. is this because of training bias ?
Is there any research data on dynamics over past years ?
82%[0] of Australian utilities' water comes from surface sources, so you'd need to look at only the section of the population who drink exclusively groundwater.
I was mostly joking, I am not from the US and not skilled enough to be considered for bothering with creating a visa for me when there are thousands of developers much more fit for this in the USA. But it is neat to see that the requirements are not as intense as I would've expected
Why couldn’t they name it `agent-bash` then? What’s with all the “just-this”, “super-that” naming?
Like developer lost the last remaining brain cells developing it, and when it’s came to name it, used the first meaningless word that came up.
After all you’re limiting discovery with name like that.
If author tried native macOS development with agent for an hour, they wouldn’t know where to begin explaining how different is agentic web development from native. It was better year ago, you could actually get to build a native app.
Now all models over-think everything, they do things they like and igniter hard constraints. They picked all that in training. All these behaviours, hiding mistakes, shameful silence, going “woke” and doing what they think should be done despite your wishes.
All this is meliorated in web development, but for native it made it a lot worse.
And visual testing, compare in-browser easy automated ride with retest-it-yourself for 50th time.
Okay but what about scammers, they don’t drive engagement. Why leave them be untouched. I report scammer who pretends to be e.musk with name e.musk and sent me fake musk’s passport in chat, asking to invest- what more of impersonation scam could that be. Meta’s response - we reviewed and took appropriate steps. Yet scammer guy still untouched chatting with me weeks later.
Scammers drive a lot traffic, pay for ads, people check Facebook more often while being scammed, and search for support and help from peers on Facebook after being scammed, driving engagement in the form of support, ridicule and rage.
reply