davesnx's comments

On: ReScript 8.4

[davesnx]

That's a project that we all wished was in a perfect shape in order to make Reason more approchable with jsoo.

On: ReScript 8.4

[davesnx]

That's very doable, but tedious to make and it's probably on of the selling points for Reason. Writting React code with OCaml is very tedious.

On: Q: A faster re-implementaiton of jq written in Rea...

[davesnx]

I tried to explain it on the Performance section and on the report

https://github.com/davesnx/query-json#performance https://github.com/davesnx/query-json/blob/master/benchmarks...

But all explanations aren't based by any evidence, just asumptions.

On: Q: A faster re-implementaiton of jq written in Rea...

[davesnx]

I trend to use jq with a file all the time, I prefer to curl first and later operate on top. /slug

On: Q: A faster re-implementaiton of jq written in Rea...

[davesnx]

Thanks, next time if you paste the list somewhere else you can add query-json :P

On: Q: A faster re-implementaiton of jq written in Rea...

[davesnx]

+1

On: Q: A faster re-implementaiton of jq written in Rea...

[davesnx]

Yes, jq is written in C. Where LISP comes from?

On: Q: A faster re-implementaiton of jq written in Rea...

[davesnx]

Exactly I didn't claim to be faster in all the cases, since there's no feature parity and I won't make it that way.

For the set of operations that I implement it it's faster, that's true.

On: Q: A faster re-implementaiton of jq written in Rea...

[davesnx]

Exactly! I wanted to contact him

On: Q: A faster re-implementaiton of jq written in Rea...

[davesnx]

I hope so!