d0100's comments

On: AI is too expensive

[d0100]

> GPT 5.4 instead of 5.5.

I am exclusively using 5.4 because its only 1x and very good, but the github calculation showed my once $40 become a $680 billing

That is too expensive and not worth paying

On: If AI writes your code, why use Python?

[d0100]

> Python is, thus, clearly superior to other languages in terms of ease of review.

Do we get visual comparisons along with this bold claim?

On: Show HN: I built an open-source email builder, alternative to Beefree/Unlayer

[d0100]

I remember doing a MailChimp "clone" in Laravel some 12 years ago and implementing an email builder using their templates

On: Flue is a TypeScript framework for building the next generation of agents

[d0100]

I am using TS sandboxed in deno for all our agent code generated from a UI builder (inspired by OpenAI's own agent builder, and spits out the same code output)

On: Does Postgres Scale?

[d0100]

Are you using Temporal with distributed workers?

We have a simple worker setup and temporal is pretty easy to setup

Out only issue is really needing an intermediary data store for task result storage

We are using DBOS in new projects as it's even simpler and the downside (task log interface behind saas) is easily remedied with a copilot generated task viewer

On: Zed 1.0

[d0100]

Tried using Zed but for some reason the AI can't open the browser?

On: Who owns the code Claude Code wrote?

[d0100]

The trick is to constrain the LLM to program in a very defined coding style

If I make the LLM generate code that follows my own code architecture and style, that should be enough creative input

[everforward → d0100]

Possibly; I'm not going to hazard a guess on what the Supreme Court will decide the exact bar is. I just don't think it will be either extreme. "Nothing is copyrighted" is too damaging to the economy, "everything is copyrighted" has weird impacts on non-LLM copyrights that conflict with precedent.

On: Measuring Claude 4.7's tokenizer costs

[d0100]

I went from plan with opus, implement with claude, to simply plan and implement with GPT 5.4

It's a very good model for a very good price

[WithinReason → d0100]

What is "claude"?

On: Claude.ai down

[d0100]

GPT 5.4 is working pretty well for me, both in Copilot and Codex vscode extensions

If you create a plan it follows it closely

On: Instant 1.0, a backend for AI-coded apps

[d0100]

Any example more complex in the backend?

Are we supposed to expose all entities and relationships and rely on row level security?

[stopachka → d0100]

> Any example more complex in the backend?

The home page has some examples of complex startups that use Instant as their core infra:

https://www.instantdb.com/#:~:text=Startups%20love%20Instant

> Are we supposed to expose all entities and relationships and rely on row level security?

Yes. This may feel foreign, but we think it's one the best ways to do permissions. We were originally inspired by Facebook's EntPrivacy. When you have permissions at the object layer, you can be more confident that _any_ query you write would be allowed.