I think your insight is spot on. We're already starting to see the shift towards "hard/deep tech". My observation is that investors are scrambling away from pure software plays and LLM wrappers, and more towards foundational tech or infrastructure.
IMO that's still "tech moat" thinking. The real moat nowadays is GTM traction, and "creativity/taste". All software can be copied, but the creation of new concepts/solutions and trends, is still uniquely something that requires a deep understanding of the "WHYs" and "HOWs" as I've described in my writing.
Yes and no. It would help to improve things a bit when it comes the measure/reconciliation phase (unclear to say how much). However we've already done a pretty good job around batching writes vs reads.
However passing a million lines of code through pretext is unlikely to be very efficient, so a lot of the work around estimation is still very important.
That said, while I don't want to make pretext a direct dependency of the library, there's a good chance I'll explore the possibility of allowing devs to pass it in as an additional argument perhaps improve performance a bit.
It should also be noted that we have a full API to support things like line annotations (comments, etc) that are entirely controlled by the user, so there's always a bit of a dynamic aspect there that would come into play
I think it's amazing how deep you can go in something as simple as rendering diffs, and I'm really grateful you shared that writeup (in fact I've been following you loosely since the Kiip days as a then aspiring designer+developer type).
I've always been curious how products like ag-grid are able to allow you to lazy-load 10,000,000+ rows in a table without the blanking you described, and I imagine this type of method describes how it can be done.
IMO that's still "tech moat" thinking. The real moat nowadays is GTM traction, and "creativity/taste". All software can be copied, but the creation of new concepts/solutions and trends, is still uniquely something that requires a deep understanding of the "WHYs" and "HOWs" as I've described in my writing.
reply