Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | conradev's comments login

Looks like he actually tried it:

  But some ideas cannot be crushed by bankruptcy and the dream of providing lenses to all of America’s hens was carried on by the son of one of Vision Control Inc.’s founders, a young Mr. Randall Wise. Wise, a Harvard Business school graduate and former nautical shipping consultant, used the millions he made from selling his software company to establish Animalens, Inc.

 Instead of pecking at each other (success!), the hens were now pecking at the air, rubbing their eyes repeatedly on their wings, and suffering from corneal ulcers and ruptured eyes.
https://www.vice.com/en/article/chickens-wore-sunglasses-ind...

An even simpler explanation is that regular UI redesigns are an important tool for a device manufacturer to make the experience feel new or refreshed, and this novelty helps sell devices. Everyone reacts to the content of the redesign when it lands, but the fact that it happens should not be surprising.

Usability issues only manifest after point of sale. Messaging/marketing happens after the work has been done (and can involve post-rationalization).


This theory is in the same space:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cosmological_natural_selection

I don’t think it has a hypothesis for the origin, though


See also the recent HN discussion about Blowtorch Theory, which has roots in (but doesn’t necessitate) CNS

  building on ten years of earlier research for a book on cosmological natural selection
This is awesome, thank you! I’m interested in the general space

I loved this overview on our current approaches to measure the expansion: https://youtu.be/WNyY1ZYSzoU


I was more excited by the process, like, there exists a model out there so powerful it requires KYC

which, after using it, fair! It found a zero day


I think they're probably more concerned about fake accounts and people finding ways to get free stuff.

China is training their AI models using ChatGPT. They want to stop or slow that down.

Why? It seems counterproductive given OpenAI's mission statement: "We are building safe and beneficial AGI, but will also consider our mission fulfilled if our work aids others to achieve this outcome."

Because OpenAI's actual mission statement is "money, and lots of it".

Yeah. I think they need money to deliver AGI

I actually think they’re worried about foreign actors using it for…

- generating synthetic data to train their own models

- hacking and exploitation research

etc


What free stuff? It requires a paid API.

With no intention to tarnish your pure world view, paid services with low registration requirements are ideal for account laundering and subscription fraud with stolen credit cards

> which, after using it, fair! It found a zero day

Source?


Recently, Sean Heelan wrote a post "How I used o3 to find CVE-2025-37899, a remote zeroday vulnerability in the Linux kernel’s SMB implementation". It might be what they are referring to.

Link: https://sean.heelan.io/2025/05/22/how-i-used-o3-to-find-cve-...


Yep, that’s the one!

[flagged]


Bit strange to see such new accounts already priming everyone to think this is acceptable and normal, which it isn't, hence OA having started doing this months ago and still not a single other provider has it, despite offering just as powerful models. It's not like Google and Anthropic have launched their own Worldcoin either.

Especially what does it have to do with that "these models are getting more powerful"?

Basically the earmark of a narrative OpenAI loves to push covertly, and often overtly. I wouldn't be shocked if these are bots.

There is an ISO standard for digital ID, the same one used by the TSA, and it’s coming to the web soon! Human verification is going to continue to grow in importance.

which standard is that?


Which version of Xcode drops the last Intel SDK as a deployment target?

I first encountered this with gas in the Ethereum VM. For Ethereum, they price different operations to reflect their real world cost: storing something forever on the blockchain is expensive whereas multiplying numbers is cheap

I’m not sure what it’s used for in this context or how instructions are weighted


Let's consider that you create a serverless platform which runs wasm/wasi code. The code can do an infinite loop and suck resources while blocking the thread that runs the code in the host. Now, with a fuel mechanism the code yields after a certain amount of instructions, giving the control back to the host. The host can then do things such as stop the guest from running, or store the amount of fuel to some database, bill the user and continue execution.

One of the reasons OrbStack is so great is because they implement their own hypervisor: https://orbstack.dev/

Apple’s stack gives you low-level access to ARM virtualization, and from there Apple has high-level convenience frameworks on top. OrbStack implements all of the high-level code themselves.


How does it compare to apple’s hv?


  Just wrong. Don’t do that
I’d personally qualify this: don’t ship that code, but absolutely do it personally to grow if you’re interested.

I’ve grown the most when I start with things I sort of know and I work to expand my understanding.


  Is there an alternative way?

  Yes, there is. It is called DNS over TLS and is specified as a proposed standard in RFC 7858. This provides transport encryption to DNS without abusing HTTP as transport protocol.
HTTP/3 is a full VPN protocol via MASQUE. I don’t understand how DNS over TLS is anything but slightly less convenient and otherwise no different than DNS over HTTP.

This is why serverless is taking off on the opposite end of the spectrum (and why it’s so cheap)

You can share memory not only at the machine level, but between different applications.


Consider applying for YC's Fall 2025 batch! Applications are open till Aug 4

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: