Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | codethief's commentslogin

> I hadn't heard of Pijul

I'm surprised! Pijul has been discussed here on HN many, many times. My impression is that many people here were hoping that Pijul might eventually become a serious Git contender but these days people seem to be more excited about Jujutsu, likely because migration is much easier.


Looks like it makes the homepage only once or twice a year (using points>50 as a proxy for that), had more buzz around five years ago: https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=false&qu...

I too am here all the time and have never heard of it. But it looks interesting.

What features would you expect from a good word processor? What features should it leave out, i.e. features make MS Office / OpenOffice / LibreOffice a bloated mess?

Start fast (maybe <100ms), respond instantly, good UX.

It is absolutely crazy to me that this is criteria. Office 2003 checked those boxes in that era. This was a solved thing that somehow warrants further deliberation now. I believe it is The Great Moore's Law Compensator.

I've long been thinking the same thing. In many fields of mathematics the placeholder $ from the OP is often written •, i.e. partial function application is written as f(a, b, •). I've always found it weird that most functional languages, particularly heavily math-inspired ones like Haskell, deviate from that. Yes, there are isomorphisms left and right but at the end of the day you have to settle on one category and one syntax. A function f: A × B -> C is simply not the same thing as a function f: A -> B -> C. Stop treating it like it is.

No TLS?

You need https.

If you need to reinstall Windows so frequently, have you considered giving Linux a shot? I switched 16 years ago and haven't looked back. Until recently, I used Ubuntu and I think I had to reinstall twice in 15 years, one of which was when I got a new laptop.

Last year I switched to NixOS and while my impression is that it's going to be much more stable even than Ubuntu, installation also only takes me 5 minutes. That is, 5 min until my system is in exactly the state I want, including installed software, window manager config, keyboard shortcuts, desktop wallpaper, GUI theme, etc.


I don't know, man. For the past year I've been having the "pleasure" of using Windows again for the first time in 16 years. My coworkers recommended I try the WSL since in their eyes I'm a "Linux guy". Well, the WSL crashed an hour into using it (forcing me to reboot Windows because nothing else helped) and then a couple more times that very same day. On a fresh Windows installation.

I ended up installing VMWare and using a full Linux VM. Yes, VMWare. That's how desperate I was.


> On Android, you need to request the desktop version, rotate the phone to landscape, and refresh; assuming you have a tall enough screen (in px).

That's what I thought should do the trick, too, but for me it worked neither in Firefox nor in Chrome. (I have a Pixel 10 Pro, so the resolution should definitely be high enough.)


I feel like it's been years since I saw the request desktop version button in mobile browsers have any effect on the site I had loaded.

I haven't worked closely with web stuff in years, either, though- so I haven't looked into why. But that button just feels like it taunts me, now.


Worked on Pixel 8!

> Developers can choose to not undergo verification, thereby remaining anonymous. The only change is […]

"The only change" – with all due respect, are you even listening to yourself? The "only change" is that you, as a developer, will be completely excluded from publishing apps in the Play Store and that people effectively won't be able to install your app anymore! (Unless you were targeting only e.g. F-Droid users to begin with, which very few apps do.)

In essence, you are cutting down on the privacy of tens of thousands of honest developers around the world in the name of protecting users from scammers and you're pretending that 1) it's a nothingburger and 2) developers have a choice.


>The "only change" is that you, as a developer, will be completely excluded from publishing apps in the Play Store

Google Play already requires developer verification: https://support.google.com/googleplay/android-developer/answ...


https://developer.android.com/developer-verification

Note that the OP is about side loading, i.e. installing apps from non-Play Store sources and thereby circumventing developer verification.


This. Side loading being restricted is only one part of the problem; the other is mandatory developer verification for apps distributed through the Play Store.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: